>>171
I just started mg a few weeks ago after getting fed up once too often with emacs. It's certainly the best lite emacs out there. I wish it had:

- better support for unicode
- better documentation for binding things. Sometimes you have to put a \, sometimes a ^, and the examples are completely unhelpful.

I'd probably switch full time if it had syntax highlighting (yes, I'm weak) and if I had a good stand-alone LaTeX reformatter.