Would you say it's easier for a newbie to pick up programming by learning an interpreted language ?
Two good docs for would-be programmers:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
ITT: Pussies who don't have the brain plasticity to learn assembly
>>17
I wasted all my grey matter on eroge and 4chan, leave me alone.
>>13
ASM is not a clusterfuck. C and its undefined behavior is a clusterfuck.
>Would you say it's easier for a newbie to pick up programming by learning an interpreted language ?
I would say it depends on what are you like/want to do more.
I dare to object. Every self-respecting C compiler should spill warnings about UB, until you bend over. To top it off for a bit, stronger typing of C++ treats some UB as hard errors (while creating plethora of new ones in it's wild-west approach to OO).
>>20
Please don't start with PHP, for the love of God. That is the worst thing anyone could do.
>>22
I mean, feel free to learn it at some point as I fully understand it is necessary to know in some lines of work, but to learn it as a first language will give you bad habits that are hard to drop if they're the first things you learnt.
>>20
No, oh my god no. PHP is no. Just no.
Is you want to pick up an actual language that is easy, go with Python or Ruby.
PHP is an actual programming language. It is, however, not a general-purpose programming language.