>>84,93
Maybe a poor curation, I apologize DQNs. ED article kinda sums it up I suppose. Basically he was a spook, but accused several major Internet sites but especially Google of being spooks, and was half-right about a lot of that, but also a major hypocrite (e.g. using Gmail address on site claiming Cloudflare is spooks). Lobbied to get his English Wikipedia article disappeared, because again, half-right about invasions of privacy and all that. But still a majorly inconsistent agenda-driven weirdo.

After many years of Web presence, he seems to have disappeared into the ether. Today, the very term "Google watch" is more likely to bring to mind a speculative brand name for wearable tech than the many crank sites titled "insert conspiracy here watch" of yesteryear, of which he ran a few.