Criticism of Porno Industry (48)

1 Name: dood : 2007-10-21 20:48 ID:n3IjTwIh

Why is the porno industry catering to the lowest denominator? What do I see in stores and all over the place? "Barely Legal!" "I'm 18!" "Teen Sluts!" Why? Because the porn industry apparently doesn't like the fact that society thinks pedocrap to be disgusting and has made it illegal, so they make an end-run around it by looking up girls on their 18th birthday (or 16th, or 19th, or whatever it is, depending on the country). But there is a deeper reason. Some people like to rebel and to break rules, no matter HOW tough the penalties are (well, they're overblown in some countries, but there SHOULD be penalties). There is a well-known Asian fetish out there. Why not focus on that, and leave the teenagers alone? I've had enough of girls grinning like Steeplechase rather than being seductive or trying to be seductive.

2 Name: dood : 2007-10-21 21:16 ID:n3IjTwIh

TEENAGERS NEED TO BE LEFT ALONE TO BE TEENAGERS!

3 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-21 21:51 ID:3cNeAEKw

Teens are hot. Can't help it. It's a human thing. Also, lol.

4 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-21 22:44 ID:Heaven

>>2

which means lotsa sexs right? I mean come one, teenagers are the horniest of people.

5 Name: Default : 2007-10-22 02:58 ID:c984mZKR

ugh. Pedo=fail.
I say asians and hentai, and people at least 21.

6 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-22 04:13 ID:EM5PWnKP

>>1
hey jerkoff, not everyone likes asian girls or cartoon porn

why not tell them to let asians be asians?
unless you believe that women of asian decent naturally enjoy having sex for money or getting jizzed on by 50 guys?

also >>4 is right, teens fuck each other all the time and sometimes i'm in the mood to get off to people near my age (19), unless you're telling me that once someone becomes 19 they suddenly gain intellect, maturity, and the right to do pornos the moment they blow those candles out.

7 Name: hmnmmm : 2007-10-22 05:28 ID:n3IjTwIh

>>6 has a point. Laws have the great misfortune of drawing arbitrary distinctions, on the ground that they need clear cut definitions if they are to be enforceable at all without submitting to someone's whim.

I'm sure of a few other things:
1)Children have a right to have a childhood. That means that people shouldn't exploit or abuse them.
2)Parents are very adamant about item number 1, by and large.
3)Those same parents want molesters and abusers behind bars. CP is one of the clearest evidences there is of molestation and abuse.
4)That being said, there are also social conservatives who don't like the fact that [i]any[/i] porn is out on the market. The First Amendment is merely an obstacle in their way, from their point of view. Since they're blocked from downing adult porn (which has become too acceptable in society for them), they switch to the fringe of pornography and they hitch a ride on all the juicy sex scandals about the Catholic Church, etc.
5)This has led to an unfortunate overpenalization of the possession of CP, which is apparently kosher because CP is "obscene" and thus outside the bounds of First Amendment protection.
6)It is overpenalization because someone trying to get, and stick to, legitimate porn may wind up getting illegal porn in the mix without intending to, and the porn industry may inadvertently be adding to the problem via those barely-legal publications (which, for all we know, may have some folks who aren't yet legal in there). Someone might get 5 years in the slammer through no willing fault of his (or less likely her) own, but because of something some other idiot did.
7)The criminalization of pedo-porn is often an excuse to bust people who have legitimate porn and who are only interested in legit porn, due to stuff in their porn that they might not realize they have. To wit, one person in Australia got busted for kiddie porn smuggling because he had generic porn DVDs and video games which happened to have one or two underage pics in them. My guess here is that some cops are social conservatives and are mainly out to pounce on the porn, regardless of whether the porn carrier intended to have child porn in there or not.

8 Name: hmnmmm : 2007-10-22 05:28 ID:n3IjTwIh

<i>any</i>

9 Name: hmnmmm : 2007-10-22 05:29 ID:n3IjTwIh

damn. that doesn't work, either. At least that worked on 4chan. when will it get up and running again?

10 Name: hmnmmm : 2007-10-22 05:34 ID:n3IjTwIh

Anyway, pedofags are reviled as perverts around the world, because they pounce on the helpless and the naive when they're helpless and naive. (Some of the countries of the Islamic world may be an exception, but who cares about the Islamic world? those folks also practice female genital mutilation, and they blow up shrines, skyscrapers, and each other; they subjugate women and call it equality and honoring the women, and so on and so forth. Besides, it is well known that their prophet Muhammad married a 9-year-old, which may explain why the Muslim world has so much pedoperversion. Also, it explains why Michael Jackson was so eager to move to Bahrain.)

11 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-22 06:05 ID:EM5PWnKP

>>10

facepalm
way to go off topic and rant like a typical bigot.

12 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-22 06:40 ID:4tH3w+dK

>>10

double facepalm

for general faggotry, ignorant ignorance and islamophobia.
durr,, I guess that's a

triple facepalm

13 Name: hmnmmm : 2007-10-22 06:48 ID:n3IjTwIh

I must be addled in the head tonight. must be all that beer I drank.

14 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-22 18:28 ID:m+uggfT7

Spoilers: Porn is technically illegal in America. It's just the cops are unwilling to persecute because they don't consider it too bad.

15 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-22 23:21 ID:Heaven

PROTIP: Those 'barely legal teen girls' are 24 year old women.

> It is overpenalization because someone trying to get, and stick to, legitimate porn may wind up getting illegal porn in the mix without intending to... Someone might get 5 years in the slammer through no willing fault of his (or less likely her) own, but because of something some other idiot did.
> The criminalization of pedo-porn is often an excuse to bust people who have legitimate porn and who are only interested in legit porn, due to stuff in their porn that they might not realize they have.

Re: American Porns: 2257
(Actually a backhanded attempt to practise discriminate censorship through a 'think of the children' plea, but it saves your ass, too)

> Michael Jackson

...is not a proven child molester, regardless of how creepy he is.

16 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 00:38 ID:n3IjTwIh

Re: American Porns: 2257

what does that mean?

17 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 00:59 ID:66S5aLHP

> Why is the porno industry catering to the lowest denominator?

It's because jews run the porno industry. That's why you see so many blacks on whites porn and other filthy shit like that.

IT'S THE JEWS

18 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 02:19 ID:SjMF6Rvm

>>17
that makes no sense

19 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 02:43 ID:66S5aLHP

>>18
You make no sense. Just look behind the scenes of the prono industry. It's the jews who run the show.

20 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 02:48 ID:jRt9dLMn

> blacks on whites porn

Someone should make arabs on jews pron. Big dick arab men ramming pure jew women.

21 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 02:51 ID:Heaven

>>20

durrrrrrr

22 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 04:51 ID:EM5PWnKP

>>17

JEEEEWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!

but seriously, facepalm

23 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 11:29 ID:Heaven

>>15

>PROTIP: Those 'barely legal teen girls' are 24 year old women.

And so are the children. Jokes aside, there's this chick in the normal porn industry who looks like 12 or 14, but is older than 20 by now (was 19 in the image I saw some year or two ago). I found that highly confusing - I guess it's better than some real kid, but still... I don't see why she has a job in that industry. Surely that can't be THAT much in demand. I wish I could remember her name, but especially her site was clearly catering to the pedos. Lil' Miss something, was her "name", IIRC.

24 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-23 14:19 ID:BB5g+FX2

>>19
we need names. how do we know you're not a jew then? post your social security id here. That's the only way we know that you're not a Jew.

25 Name: Default : 2007-10-23 23:10 ID:c984mZKR

>>24
He shoots, he scores!

26 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-24 07:24 ID:OLTg8G+V

>>23

I think at least a few people like the idea that it's "bad" or "dangerous" and it's exciting for them. You have to remember, these things cost next to nothing to produce, so even if you only sell 1000 copies, you've probably made a fair amount of money. Plus, if you distribute over the internet, you can reduce your overhead by that much. Of course, that opens the door to easy(er) piracy, but that's business.

27 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-24 15:09 ID:yVlPuZdp

>>23
Little April?

28 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-24 16:03 ID:Heaven

>>27
No. I'm positive it wasn't that.

29 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-25 11:16 ID:aI06SgKK

>>28
It's an american-asian girl isn't it? I've seen one of her trailers. She looks far too young :s

30 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-25 11:53 ID:Heaven

>>29
Yeah, that has to be her.

31 Post deleted.

32 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-25 20:37 ID:m+uggfT7

>>23
Who cares what people think of when they jack off? It's not a BIG SECRET that men like young women so obviously there is going to be a market for young looking girls. But who cares as long as it is legal. (My actual opinion though is that porn production should be illegal, akin to prostitution, but that's another story.)

33 Name: Default : 2007-10-26 02:17 ID:c984mZKR

>>32
It's mostly produced in San Francisco and Los Angeles. I figure there's probably a set of laws that allow it...

34 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-12 18:59 ID:NR2mFPtS

Why outlaw porn?
Morality is a cancer.

35 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-12 21:45 ID:Heaven

>>23,29
Are you talking about Kitty?

36 Name: eroboy!!CmDw7lyq : 2007-11-13 02:11 ID:D8XbGBTE

>>23>>29 does she have red hair??? im pretty sure ive got that set lawl

37 Post deleted.

38 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-13 23:24 ID:m+uggfT7

>>37
And you should just kill yourself.

39 Post deleted.

40 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-15 12:22 ID:BB5g+FX2

>>34
Having morals allow society to function and work together as well as possible. All your thoughts will affect all your actions. Your actions will affect society which in turn, WILL affect MY LIFE. There is power in numbers and the immoral actions of society will add up to get the results we see today.

For example, the consequence of unprotected sex between unmarried or otherwise uncommited couples results in an unplanned pregnancy or an STD. This results in abortion or otherwise children that grow up in an unstable environment. These children grow to be low lives which live their life to sustain their meagre existance. They will also desire to fulfill the basic requirements of the human psyche. This will mean they will seek drugs and sex and will use violence as part of their culture to fulfill themselves.

This is just an example of stuff that happens when parts of society live life with loosened morals. Your morals affect me and how I live my life. So please, if you're going to have sex, USE A FUCKING CONDOM

41 Name: eroboy!!CmDw7lyq : 2007-11-15 12:34 ID:D8XbGBTE

>>40 wtf does wearing a condom have to do with this thread? you jumped from talking about morality to telling us to use a condom. whoever said that not wearing a condom goes against morals? whats to say that married couples have unplanned pregnancies? and whats to say that illegitimate children will grow up in unstable environments? I was an unplanned pregnancy (not illegitimate tho) and my parents divorced when i was only 1 year old and i have no memory of my father. since when was growing up with a single parent a bad thing? i mean, sure, i dont know my father but i dont care. Im not a failure, i go to university currently with a gpa of 6. I have a job, and couldnt have grown up in a more beneficial, stable and loving environment.

you have given no evidence or any form of information to back up your claims. answer me this: how does someone who has sex and doesnt wear a condom directly affect you (unless you get fucked by them)?

42 Name: 4n7i-Squeeks : 2007-11-15 12:44 ID:AfqRzqw/

>>38

NO U

43 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-16 15:23 ID:NR2mFPtS

>>40
So me jacking off will affect your life in a negative way? How?

44 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-16 17:34 ID:SJ7aHtvv

>>41

silence gaywad

45 Name: i like crisps : 2007-11-18 21:24 ID:SHV4z7B8

Porn is for assholes!! espeicially teen porn.

I'm glad that there is SOME people out there, even if it's only like 3 who are against
porn or at least the 'barely legal' teenage shit.
Nobody will admit to being a peedo, but everyone IS a peedo considering 'teen sex' is in
the top 10 porn searches. Thats like 40 million peedos every month.

Gawd I feel ill. The internet is unregulated, there are countless amateur websites out there
with girls who are obviously way under 18 and in some form of duress and you can't stop it since they are hosted in
foreign countries like Russia.
For example Brent Corrigan was 17 when he first did commercial porn.

Even Jenna Jameson thinks that the minimum age should be raised to 21.

18 is way too immature, they don't have any sagacity. It sickens me that vulnerable girls my age do this kind of thing.
Porn is fucked up. It attracts fucked up people and it fucks people up. Seriously
what is up with all this beastiality,gang rape and other sorts of degradation and
humiliation of the lowest form.

I believe the age minumum age for porn should be 22 and that shit like teen sex,beastiality,
bukkake, gang rape and all other extreme shit should be banned. Unfortunately since
all the goverment watch this kind of thing, they won't pass on this legislation. lol burn

I just find it ridiculous that right now, with a few clicks of a button I can
literally look at thousands videos of children getting tortured and raped, this is so sad and sick.

Why is it that nobody who works in the sex industry eg.porn stars, prostitutes actually wants their own kids
to do it?? So there must be something bad about it.

gayness.

46 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-20 03:06 ID:a0eXd/s6

this thread fucking sucks also you're fucking crazy

47 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-20 03:13 ID:a0eXd/s6

>>45
what the hell are you even trying to say?

48 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-03 02:41 ID:Heaven

>>1
I could barely make out what you were saying. Your thoughts were all over the place. As for your first question, why they cater to the lowest common denominator, is entirely trivial, so much so that I'm beginning to think you are a girl around the age of 14-15. Let's assume that you simply are arguing for the age limit to be raised in the porn industry.

Consider that there is a huge amount of homemade pornography made by teenagers themselves without any regard to business and placed directly unto the internet. Is this a separate issue?

fuck this thread has made me hot ive lost my train of thought, i gotta go fap. brb

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.