>>35
Heh, are you ridiculing me?
> And yet you wouldn't marry them if you loved them that much?
Like I said, marriage is not just a question of love. I mean even if you love somebody, you wouldn't rush to marry them righ away. You need to know them better, probably live with them for a couple of monts/years before you decide to live your whole life with them (which would be the ideal marriage).
The first true love - even if it lasts for years - isn't necessary the one you'll marry.
> I didn't say it was the meaning of life. I said (or rather, repeated what I often hear) that it was the highest form of intimacy between two (or more, lol) people.
Here, I agree with you. Sex is the maximum that you can give to your partner (as speaking of intimacy)
> HEY MISS, LET'S HAVE SEX....
Hey, if you'd find a girl who you really love, wouldn't you want to sex with her? And if you're not on the same "wawelength" in sex, wouldn't you want to do something? It's better to leave a partner before marriange than marry someone and then divorce because you don't get along.
But I haven't experienced marriage so I'd never know. :P
I'm on the golden mean. I think "no sex before marriage" is obsolete but "living for just sex" and one-night relationships are bad too. I think one should have a few relationships/sex partners before they settle with one and marry them.