The Theory of Love (264)

148 Name: Demian : 2006-05-14 21:36 ID:O/+lOSvL

>Just as in any debate, one speaks, and the other replies with feedback, whether positive or negative.

A debate is a discussion between two sides (correctly speaking) or more. At times it may take the form of interrogation, and sometimes a discussion leader may evolve. On these boards however, that leading role is decentralized among all contributors. Leading power is never complete, and is attributed by others due to attraction to previous posts. If you want your ideas respected, serious thought is key. A little respect also helps sometimes. Also, remain within the bounds of the discussion. Here, we'd like to talk about theory of love.

Here, we have some who downright refute the concept of love, but we also have plenty who accept it in some form or other. A few of those, including me, try to formalize the theory a little, whereas others find that a futile exercise, or downright disgusting because love just 'is,' or 'happens to you.' Since we have these subgroups, it might be useful to start tagging ourselves at some point for easier identification. I'll be waiting for ideas. More important to the fruitful development of this discussion however is that we stop flaming (posting useless and unconstructive insult) each other, because that only lead to contributors exiting, even or perhaps especially those who sincerely post here. And that's a waste.

Pms, I've mentioned before that you should be more careful when reading people's posts. There are many people here who spend considerable time on their thoughts and posts, so don't think you'll understand straight away what they are saying. So either read into posts with care, or find a dictionary and search for 'contradiction.' It will also give you the correct spelling.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.