so >>6 .. your implying >>5 is not man enough? LOL

>>6 it seems to me you are implying those who aren't a fucking machine are evolutionary degeneration, and it is best for them to be left out of the gene pool. And those that are, you, like how many times you been going around on this board to fluant that to us, gives us the impression you are worthy of living than those who aren't or those who don't have relationships.

Don't boost yourself, boosting your ego and confidence here seems to reflect on your confidence issues since most of the people on this board don't have these experiences and mostly likely bitter and depressed. So you get your jolly off by making it sound you got it better than most of the people here?

One day, if you ever have a child who is incapable, you would probably mock him for being a degenerative evolutionary human who shouldn't be entitled to pass on his genes simply because he isn't man enough or provide the best sex to prove that he is physically strong.