i dont see that this thread provides anything worthwhile to this board. fwiw, im the original writer of >>22.

>>24 i dont see being older as necessarily being indicative of more wisdom or even experience on the subject, but i will halfway agree with your assessment of this thread. the first post is incredibly naive, but im going to give the poster credit beyond a teenage girl because it seems to attempt the application of occum's razor to the concept of love. which is a poor way to use it, but the way i see it the poster came right out of philosophy 101 and started writing this post.

also, good observation with english being a poor language to define love within. this thread wants to umbrella love, well the english language conveniently does it for you. the topic is only worth discussing when you want to go beyond generalizations.

and let's be real folks. you wont be giving or receiving any major revelations about the concept of love on 4-ch. you want to share your personal observations? fantastic! but dont tell us you figured it out and everyone else is wrong when we all know better.