http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/5297600.stm
lolocaust doesn't live in UK, does he?
>>24
On Guro boards? That must have hurt. (unless photoshopped)
Images/videos of REAL children ACTUALLY being tortured/abused/molested/raped should result in jailtime.
ANIMATED or DRAWN things, which are NOT real, should NOT result in jailtime.
Congrats for the original and thought-provoking opinion you formed over the course of the last 6 months without activity in this thread.
I'm not sure where >>26 got the idea they were talking about children.. maybe one just thinks that way when pedophilia drives them to paranoia.
Likely, >>26 is referring to the newer UK law that tries to ban possession of yet another type of pornography. Interestingly, each BBC article that talks about one of these laws cites that it "closes a legal loophole", as if there were prior laws about it. In nanny-land, is it illegal to possess non-sexual, "vanilla" gore - be it human or drawn?
I'm so glad I ain't into that shit even if it weren't illegal thats all I'm gonna say. But the Idea of censor ship is one I don't like.
| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|
|EROGRO INNOCENCE|
|________|
∧∧ ||
>>11
Guro is short for eroguronansensu which means erotic grotesque nonsense. Guro when done right is suppose to be sexually arousing, disgusting, and comical.
I defy anyone in this thread to provide a reasonable, objective set of restrictions on a drawing from which it can be considered illegal.
Also, what are you trying to outlaw by outlawing guro? Are you trying to get at the people who enjoy that? What, are they crimethinkers? What next, will we outlaw drawings of people doing drugs? Outlaw explanations of computer vulnerabilities? Outlaw the advertisement of "dangerous" beliefs? I think you can see where this is going.
>crimethinkers
Heh, I like this term. And I'm glad I don't live in the UK, because I love my guro.
>Heh, I like this term.