It look like this is kinda new for me.
Please, give us more details.
Does it have more or less CP than Freenet?
Considerably less. Actually none. The network is not truly anonymous in the sense that you have no identity on it. It is pseudonymous, so if you host or post CP, the rest of anonet can simply nullroute your IP within the network. Notably there is also the deterrent that if you're actually dumb enough to host CP, at least one person knows your real IP.
It's a different purpose than things like Freenet. Freenet is for people who want to do illegal things without being caught, like share CP or plan terrorist attacks.
anoNet is for people who are just plain paranoid. The type of people who would make you recite a password to let you in if you knocked on their door. They're not afraid of "The Man" finding out what they're doing. They're afraid of everybody finding out what they're doing.
>>25 is a lame argument.
anoNet is shit and useless. It's as secure as internet itself. You can't log in with a "stone" on internet, and you can't log in onto anoNet without a few hours of free time.
anonet is secure as in only people on the network have access to the information, snooping from outside will only return encrypted connections and nothing more, given that you can use BGP or OSPF (ano2) you can transmit information over different routes.
>anonet is for experimenting with networking and cryptology
pretty much sums it up. fie thread die fin the end owari
Yes, that's pretty much a simplified explaination of VPN.
dicks out for Harambe