Clearly DQN should be more VIP Quality (38)

12 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-15 14:45 ID:OrJQoR8i

>>6,7,11
Honestly, it seems less easy to abuse than simple necrobumping. If someone soko/shuffles a popular thread, it's trivial to just find it and bump it back to the top, whereas if somebody necrobumps an old thread it takes forever to sink back to where it belongs. If it is implemented, I foresee a short period of "abuse", followed by the feature being mostly ignored and maybe used as a sort of pseudo-moderation to hide unambiguously bad threads. I'd say let's implement soko on a provisional basis and see where things go from there.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: