>>56 is just bitter about >>50, and thinks he can just repeat the statement whereever he likes to defang it.

However, it doesn't work that way. >>49 was actual, real wankery - "But we can't be sure" about things we are, for all intents and purposes, 100% sure about (and that don't really matter anyway). >>54-55 are reasoned arguments based on the principle of least suffering. You can argue against that principle if you want, but invoking it as anything but philosophical wankery.