>>177

Science could not be done, if nature were not predictable. You would never put someone in a rocket and send them to space unless you were able to predict exactly what would happen when you lit the rockets. It's not a matter of "Let's push this button and see what happens this time." Science would be able to tell you nothing, or predict nothing without FIRST assuming that nature is uniform. You have no basis for such an assumption.

Still though, let me ask you this, is all knowledge gained by the senses?