>>58
Let's just give him the benefit of the doubt.

>>57
Oh c'mon, you know that is absurd. "Please proove that there is no proof!". Just show us some valid proof for a god if you happen to have it, that'd basically refute him. The burden of prooving your god is upon you, not vice-versa.

>>56
God just exists and god made the universe? Why not just throw out the middle man and go "The universe just exists"? It's just as valid.

>>55
We live on faith backed by evidence and often validated numerous times, theists live on hot air and and more often than not age-old writings of some sort from a time when having slaves and beating your wife was perfectly normal. We also usually have enough honesty not to rip other peoples statements out of context.

By the way, did you forget the part of >>48 about the anthropic principle? It's a perfecly valid explanation for the laws of logic as well as the uniformity of nature that does not invoke any god. No more "But you can't logically argue against god!" please, we can now, thank you very much.

>>54
Oh, great. So god is an immoral murdering asshole by human standards, but that's ok because he knows better.

>>53
Clearly, Pierre Samuel is god.