>>294 I feel kind of sorry for him. It does feel like he thought it was so fleeting that he didn't need a sock (she says having viewed it 4,872 times since discovering it). I assume in the editing suite they see it frame by frame and know exactly how much it reveals, but they probably then run it at normal speed and think, "yeah that's ok." I doubt this alone would get an 18 rating in the UK. If you blinked or were delving in your popcorn you'd miss it.

PS the teatime blog has it frame by frame and I am right - we have a swinging upwards situation. I somehow can't bear to link to it or reblog it. At this level of detail/obsession/perving it starts to feel very weird.