Tom Hiddleston 11 (1000)

1 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 12:24 ID:zRGlmuDi

Thread to talk about the actor Tom Hiddleston

401 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-18 15:41 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>386 I noticed that the author was called out for her failed logic in the comments which were then quickly closed. All's right with the world.

402 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-18 15:48 ID:Heaven

>>401 pfft at the Guardian

403 Name: Anon : 2016-07-18 15:57 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>401 The impeccable ability of the British far left to show tolerance for dissenting voices by silencing them.

405 Name: Anon : 2016-07-18 16:27 ID:zRGlmuDi

By the way, there might be video of the whole lot. KKW said that a videographer was filming the recording session: http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/06/heres-why-taylor-swift-kissed-tom-hiddleston.html?mid=facebook_nymag

406 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-18 18:08 ID:Heaven

Really?! Talk about double standards, shall we send this to the idiot at the Guardian?
http://theopdo.tumblr.com/post/147600143434/funny

408 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-18 19:55 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>407 I fully believe that his genitals are currently burrowing up into his body in some sort of defensive move. He's going to end up curled into a ball like a potato bug soon.

I understand being British and non-confrontational but I just feel like he needs to nail his colors to the mast - in some respect. That quote he gave to JH and THR did naught but bring more scorn. At this point I'd up-vote a tweet in support of TS (God, help me!) because at least he'd show some fucking balls. Where are the balls, TH? Get them out...or at least one of them!

Luke - at this point in the story - is regretting his life choices as much as TH. His mother probably wanted him to be a doctor. Awww.

409 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-18 20:42 ID:n8Ob+5ev

>>408 His balls are currently inflating Taylor's new girls. And I don't think she's giving them back anytime soon lol

Now that it's become obvious from Josh's podcast that Tom was pushed into sharing his Emmy headline with Taylor, I'm waiting to see if she'll try to ride on his coattails again, using something that's about his work to get some lip service from him for herself. This whole showdown with Kimye also makes me wonder if Taylor went for Tom with the sole intention of using him as a shield. A willing shield who didn't really understand the extent of the shitstorm he was about to get pulled into.

410 Name: Anon : 2016-07-18 21:19 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>408 British and non-confrontational - like Calvin, perhaps...?!!

>>409 I kind of assumed that the desire to make the Taylor mention came from TH himself. Not very willingly, but to shut down further comment, as he hoped (vainly, like all his PR hopes for this relationship).

411 Name: Anon : 2016-07-18 21:37 ID:zRGlmuDi

Story made up by Taylor's publicist, who must be hoping like Anon. that he will grow a pair: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/taylor-swift-is-upset-by-kimye-drama-tom-hiddleston-has-been-so-supportive-w429686

412 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-18 21:56 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>411 Actually, I think Us is floating its own stories at lot these days; wasn't it the one that gave us 'engagement watch' before GC shut that down?

And this is a pretty pathetic 'supportive boyfriend' article. He's 'telling her to be calm?' Yeah, because he doesn't want to pay for anything else she breaks in the penthouse!

Where's the 'he's running her baths with lavender oil?' Where's the 'he's giving her head massages and spooning ice cream into her mouth?' Come on, Us, make up better shit.

If you thought the sex was non-existent or bad before....

413 Name: Anon : 2016-07-18 22:13 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>412 "We've had it this week and it's not your birthday!"

414 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-18 22:15 ID:216Sc04H

Is Jason Mitchell on the ComicCon panel next weekend?

lmao kim let that tea brew for months to bring out the flavor for taylor to enjoy 💀

real cannot be bought, created, manipulated, duplicated, manufactured or imitated. you either are or you are not 💯

415 Name: Anon : 2016-07-18 22:18 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>412 I cannot actually imagine TH being of use during any crisis. Or of use in any practical way. He must be domestically quite helpless, surely? He has all the impracticability of the wafting luvvie, combined with being the man who owns 3 pairs of socks, one jumper with holes and precious little furniture other than a leather bean bag. Such a man usually owns a nice flat but turns it into a pigsty of his own making, in which he grunts around quite contentedly.

416 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-18 22:20 ID:n8Ob+5ev

>>410 The main reason I think he was pushed into it because he only mentioned it in the print piece. Because Josh wasn't interested and Tom certainly isn't interested in talking about her going by his awkward "pliss my werk can we talk abt my werk". Also the line read too much like a scripted one than something a bf would say about his gf because he's tired of ppl dumping on them as a couple.

>>414 Will his costars make jabs during the panel? Oh jeez if they do...Tom will go all quiet and close off. He must be DREADING comic con.

417 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-18 22:24 ID:216Sc04H

>>416 Going by those tweets, Jason is clearly not a Swift supporter, in fact it would appear he can't stand her. I think it's safe to assume there will be tension.

418 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-18 22:52 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>416 Someone said on ONTD that Conan O'Brien is leading the panel. This means TH needs to worry about the audience, his fellow panelists, and the moderator. Conan is a comedian and no comedian will be able to fully pass up this opportunity, I'd think.

Luke's going to need to be under the table, holding his hand and feeding him answers through an earpiece. And they've probably asked for him to be in a harness so that if it gets too embarrassing, they can just haul him up into the rafters.

419 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-18 23:04 ID:BnzEW/6z

http://www.vulture.com/2016/07/tom-hiddleston-taylor-swift-james-bond.html

What most people have been saying all along. Which suggests he knew it all along.

420 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 02:43 ID:aYzwOTVQ

Jon Voight-Roberts is now involved. SDCC is going to be messy.
http://wthanon4u.tumblr.com/post/147622904435/aishet-chayil-kaleidoscope112

421 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 02:44 ID:aYzwOTVQ

Misspelled his name but you know who I mean

422 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-19 03:58 ID:BnzEW/6z

423 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-19 05:00 ID:n8Ob+5ev

Wow. Really? Really? Comparing the murder of an innocent woman to Taylor's lying twitter(.)com/JosephKahn/status/755145643832713216
Is he trying to make the comparison that Kanye and Kim are trying to murder Taylor? What the hell is wrong with him? It's such petty crap and he's comparing to something horrific like murder.

424 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-19 05:02 ID:216Sc04H

>>420 He's taken quite a few steps back from his original tweet, making sure not to implicate Tay Tay.
I realise he has to be diplomatic for the sake of his films' promotion but his excuse that the creatives are entirely responsible for plagiarising isn't really valid. While the 'original' idea and content is formulated by the ad agency, TS and her team approved it. I don't believe TS had never seen the original viral video but I'll give her the shady benefit of the doubt that she may not have known they were copying without permission.
I'd even wager that the original video was included in style notes for the shoot.

425 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-19 05:06 ID:216Sc04H

>>423 Her defenders are showing themselves up to be quite a pack of imbeciles.
Meanwhile celebrities keep supporting the takedown... TS has definitely been stepping on toes.

This is like a Revenge of the Nerds fantasy

426 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 06:20 ID:Heaven

>>408 Ha, if he had balls, integrity and brains he would call quits now. Like others before him. We'll all know it'd be to preserve his career, but his fangirls and nannies will say that he finally realized that she is nuts and at least he'd save a minimum of dignity and reputation.

Instead he'll go for his usual low-maintanance approach: ambiguity. Act to make everyone happy, out of self-interest obviously. He can't take a stand and risk people thinking he approves of TS methods and make enemies as a consequence. But even having TS as an enemy is too much to face, he's not Styles, Gyllenhaal or Harris. Passive aggresive as he is, he'll probably create the situation so that is TS dumping him.

427 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 06:38 ID:Heaven

WB's panel is not just about Kong, the full list includes: Wonder Woman, Suicide Squad, The Lego Batman Movie, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, Kong: Skull Island and Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them.

The panel is 2 hours long, from 11:30am to 1:30pm, that means 20 minutes each (though I think Suicide Squad might take more). Enough time to make a few jokes but not too many, but since the show will be streamed, WB might prefer to keep the attention on the movie.

Anonon yes Jason will be there. I pray TS will be too.
https://comiccon2016.sched.org/event/7gI5/warner-bros-pictures?iframe=no&w=i:680;&sidebar=yes&bg=no

428 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 06:42 ID:Heaven

>>420,424 LOL, what's realy really funny is that when the original video was posted 3 years ago, Ruffalo tweeted it and TH RT it saying this:
https://twitter.
com/twhiddleston/status/288729346909286400

429 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-19 07:00 ID:n8Ob+5ev

>>425 I think I'll be joining anonsy in her tin foil cave because this is just getting too nasty now. Racism is starting to rear its ugly head and if Taylor goes with the "scary brute black man attacking the poor helpless white woman" narrative and Tom stays and sides with her in his usual passive manner, it'll speak volumes about him.

I have to ask though. I've been seeing this on tumblr now but do you guys think Taylor could be racist on some level and that's why her bfs check out so fast? Could it really all just be because she goes too fast? One of her close friends is an obvious Trump supporter. The close company you keep does reflect on you.

430 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 07:31 ID:XVu0oPjZ

>>429 I do think she was probably raised that way, on the 'be nice and civil but don't let them get too close and NEVER DATE BLACK MEN' level. On the 'make sure you have a token at your 4oJ party for the pictures' level.
And yes, on the 'be nice to any scary looking black men and just between you me and the wall they are all scary except Pharrell' level. I'm not the only one who thought she was sounded like she was placating Kanye on the recording. There's a reason why she is rumored to be very popular with White Nationalists in the US - she only dates white guys and has white close friends (not sure if Selena is getting a pass on this or if they just don't notice her).

I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall when she met his niece. (And if his brother-in-law was there - (still married to his sister?) - I can't remember his name, and I therefore can't find his facebook that someone once linked to from tumblr).

I never thought of this as being a reason her bfs left soon - I would like to think it was a combo of going too fast and the accompanying PR blitz. Maybe the rumored sex drive issue plays a part. Maybe it's a whiplash inducing seesaw between 'I must be with you now' and 'I must be with my squad now'

I would be shocked if he stayed if something racist came out about her. And he'd lose me as a supporter since he's always spoke out against racism.

431 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 08:07 ID:XVu0oPjZ

So there's this pic of Tom at what appears to be LAX that showed up Monday night: https://www.instagram.com/p/BIBThadjRdJ/

And the poster (not 100% sure if it's the guy in the picture but it seems to be) claims Taylor took the pic.

Some tumblr detectives say it was taken in April due to his hair length then compared to now, and it looks like a selfie: http://hiddlesfashion.tumblr.com/post/147618657452/ive-had-a-lot-of-questions-about-this-picture

432 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-19 08:09 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>431 Yeah, his current haircut is too short for that to be recent.

>>429 Join me. The tinfoil is nice and sparkly.

433 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 08:10 ID:XVu0oPjZ

And a comparisonof TS to the 'everyone hates Anne Hathaway' months of 2012/13: http://www.businessinsider.com.au/something-else-is-going-on-with-taylor-swift-and-its-ugly-2016-7

434 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-19 08:20 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>433 Bullshit comparison. Anne Hathaway did nothing wrong and got mocked for basically no reason. Taylor Swift is getting dragged because she's seemed like a phony for years and finally got caught in one of her backstabbing lies. Not at all the same thing, Business Insider.

435 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-19 08:24 ID:216Sc04H

>>427 I will be SHOCKED if TS goes. He works hard at those events- not a spare minute. If anything she'll fly with him to LA to sort out her mess of a life and hopefully stay there.
>>429 The company TS keeps and flaunts has I think been one of the main reasons his fans balk at the union. They are not exactly 'cultured' or 'evolved' and it's becoming apparent some of them are bigots.
It appears they would all prefer to swill champage, pretty pose, complain about their first world wealthy white problems and giggle round inflatables than discuss political, societal or racial issues.
They collectively have the depth of a childrens wading pool.
>>430 Whether or not he stays with her depends on the reason he got involved in the first place. If it was true love or for self serving promotion he will stay. He's proven his staying power with sinking ships with ISTL and despite the bad press he's receiving more name recognition than ever and an increasing army of Swifties who will pay to see Shit Island.
If it was just an intense summer fling or a short term arrangement he will leave.

436 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 08:27 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>430 It's an interesting theory. I have a slightly different one.

I bet she is a republican. Just because celebs who are democrats tend to be very vocal about it and celebs who are republican tend to keep it pretty quiet. I don't think she has ever stated a political view of any kind, and she certainly hasn't done anything so vulgar as support Hillary or Bernie, so I am guessing she is republican. It would figure as well given her background.

Not that this means she is a racist but the Republican Party is so far to the right of anything we have in the UK on any issue you care to name. That might explain why neither Brits not more "right on" American boyfriends such as Gyllenhall wanted to hang around. Particularly if her political views comprise regurgitating what her parents/older people around her have told her, which I suspect they do.

PS SG is probably an OK black friend for the white nationalists because as her tweet yesterday showed she is totally clueless about racial politics and thinks supporting BML is a case of "taking sides."

437 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 08:31 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>434 Yes quite.

438 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 08:32 ID:XVu0oPjZ

>>436 I can see that, for all the reasons you listed. And TH has voiced his dislike of and opposition to Trump on camera, so I wonder what those conversations are like between them, especially since they all end in "well, you can't vote in the November election anyway, so...."

439 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 08:34 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>431 If the pic was taken in April and Taylor took it......TINFOIL HOUSE ALERT. Possibly tinfoil over the entire state of California.

Of course the guy could be joking.

440 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 08:41 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>438 Tom was a Bernie fanboy, remember! And my guess is he is a natural Labour sympathiser (even if he may reluctantly vote with his wallet). He said something in an interview last autumn about how much integrity he thought Jeremy Corbyn had. JC is a lot more left wing than BS.

I cannot begin to imagine what TH and TS discuss full stop, let alone what they and her pathetic squad say about politics. This has always been a great mystery to me about their relationship. I'd say "well, it must be the great sex that keeps him coming back", only - yeah. And you do at some point have to get out of bed and start talking.

441 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 08:46 ID:zRGlmuDi

I can't imagine she will go to ComicCon.

But even if she doesn't he will surely get the piss taken mercilessly.

Here's a thought - if she doesn't go this will be his first time away from her since hat very brief stopover in the UK on 2/3 July, and only his second since 10 June (when seen in West Village). I wonder how that will go down, combined with the realisation that he has a relationship with a woman that a lot of his friends hold in contempt (I see you JVR - no use hiding behind those clarificatory tweets!!), or at the least make mock of. Will he double down or start to rethink his life choices?

442 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 08:48 ID:XVu0oPjZ

>>439 I think he was causing a stir on his IG, like the guy from the movie theatre last week.

>>440 Maybe that's where Ryan Reynolds's WTF face came from at the 4oJ party - stuck between 3 Repubs and a guy who was too pussy whipped (possibly) to care.

443 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 08:51 ID:XVu0oPjZ

>>441 Once he gets out of her sight, and if the bodyguards aren't there? INTERVENTION! Placing bets on how many people will pull him aside at SDCC for A Talk. Maybe they'll fly in his father.

Magic 8 ball captcha says 'dourness'

444 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 08:52 ID:XVu0oPjZ

the bodyguards >>> HER bodyguards, I meant.

445 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 09:30 ID:XVu0oPjZ

R⚡️ “Team Taylor faces some heat ” by @mic

https://twitter.
com/i/moments/755087056796282881

446 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 09:56 ID:oV1u5xlQ

>>442 Ryan Reynolds married Blake Lively in an antebellum styled wedding on a former plantation in the south...so maybe not!

447 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 11:40 ID:zRGlmuDi

Bow down and worship the Kardashians' lawyer: no reasonable expectation of privacy because the call was on speaker: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3697173/Kim-Kardashian-WON-T-prosecuted-Taylor-Swift-recording-star-knew-phone-call-Kanye-overheard.html

She would be a prize idiot to pursue KW - what are the civil damages for being exposed as a liar? Nil, I would say. http://www.celebitchy.com/495580/taylor_swift_is_considering_pursuing_criminal_civil_action_against_kanye_west/

448 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 11:49 ID:Heaven

>>447 Kaiser also makes a good point, if she didn't know he was recording her, why would her lawyers asked him to destroy all the materials months ago?

It seems to me that TS hasn't any ground for the phone call and the incriminated line, so I don't see any sensible lawyer telling her she can win. Then again, I don't think TS is mentally stable, she is a bully and like all bullies she only feels she won when she crushed her enemies. An honourable defeat is unknown to her.

449 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 12:02 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>448 He may have written through lawyers and told her to stop lying, explaining that he had recordings.

Apparently KW told People that there are more recordings, of her being told that the call was recorded and of her being told about the bitch line. Please let that be true! (It's not in the article that Kaiser links to).

450 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 12:07 ID:zRGlmuDi

And I kind of think it might be. KKW has surely not played every card she has yet. I bet she is waiting to see what new lie TS puts out before releasing more. She must be a great poker player.

451 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 12:13 ID:Heaven

>>449 In that case, her speech at the Grammys was even more stupid and arrogant, she basically challenged him to come after her.

>>450 I totally believe there are others, those snapchat videos were shared for public consumption, but they were surely meant for TS, as a warning.

452 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-19 13:38 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>450 This and THIS. I think TS thought - in an undoubtedly condescending fashion - that she had the PR and the lawyers to best KK and KW. She probably thought she'd come out smelling of roses and candy floss, as she had so many times before.

But, unlike TH, Kim Is.Not.The.One. She held on to that tape and sat on it like a mother hen. She might have released it alongside the GQ article, but that wasn't the right time (TayTo and their "true, organic romance" was all anyone was talking about) and then she had other opportunities. But no, she waited until a boring Sunday night (on the west coast so it could catch prime social media time AND some morning editions the next day) when there was nothing else going on. It had a lead-in from her own show where the TS/KW beef was mentioned. Then she teased it on her popular twitter account before releasing it on her lesser followed (though NOT now) Snapchat account. It should be noted that Snapchat users tend to be 13-24 (prime TS demographic).

I've seen NATO operations with less calculated and precise planning. In fact, I don't think I've seen a NATO operation AS precisely planned. Or as effective and devastating. Sure, TayTay will come back (her teenaged fans are both gullible and deluded) but there's no denying KK landed some fierce punches to the gut and won this round.

And hell yeah she had her lawyers all over that shit. Girl is lawyered UP. Her father was a lawyer, you don't think she'd have some serious legal power on her side? KK wouldn't have planned all this (with her mother and PR people) without consulting a lawyer.

And I don't think she's done either, Anon. I think momma hen is sitting on some more eggs.

453 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 13:50 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>452 Yep. I hate myself for typing this and I am surely going to hell, but GO KIM!!! If she has a photo of TayTo getting it on at the Met Gala I will send her actual money.

But "even" a video of TS approving the bitch line would suffice.

Did you see too how Mother Jenner lulled everyone into a false sense of security a few days before by saying she shipped TayTo and wasn't it sweet they were happy together? What she forgot to say: "Enjoy the Hiddleconda, bee-yach, because it's all you'll have to console you in a week's time."

454 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-19 13:50 ID:BnzEW/6z

455 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-19 13:55 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>453 'Don't worry, Tay, we love you, we love you. I'm stroking your cheek with one hand...don't worry about what the other is doing, don't.you.worry!' Hahahahaha. Someone got played!

A pic of Tayto kissing at the Met Ball would be glorious. And much, much harder for her robotically fawning fans to explain away...and his.

456 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 13:56 ID:zRGlmuDi

PS even if KW told TS she was being recorded, people are very good about forgetting what they said, until it is played back to them. I have seen on many occasions transcripts of what I said in court (so many arrests over the years!) (only kidding) and it is an odd experience. Some of it you clearly recall saying and some not at all - and it is my job to remember stuff like that. Butbit happensa all the time - so many cases feature at least one absolutely key conversation that two apparently normal people with no agenda recall completely differently from one another.

For someone who lives and breathes entitlement it would be even easier, I think, to tell yourself that you said this and that, and that you definitely didn't say the other.

457 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-19 14:52 ID:BnzEW/6z

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zWjO0FNoqk

James Corden may have to promise more leopards and penguins to get TH back on. The 'I don't know if she's dating someone' and 'she keeps her personal life private' bits will sting.

458 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 15:38 ID:Heaven

>>457 LOL but I doubt Corden would have to apologize, after all he did him the courtesy of not mentioning his name.

459 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 16:49 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>454 I know that most, if not all, highly successful business people get that way by being ruthless people. But wow, she really strikes me as a horrible, horrible person, who's been that way for a loooong time. Most successful people don't get to be this bad till they are aged at least 35.

460 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-19 17:21 ID:Heaven

>>459 She really is. I read some of that stuff yesterday and it made me realize that her fans must know it too, so the reason they adore her it's not because she is a nerdy, underdog (pfft her parents bought her a label company so she could début her yapping) turned into a swan, but because she is a bully who gets away with it by victimizing herself. How anyone could ever label her a symbol of feminism and a role model for young girls is beyond me.

What's worse, it took us, almost completely ignorant about her, a bit of googling to find out and we are not dating her.

461 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 18:31 ID:zRGlmuDi

Did someone already post these? Apologies if so. My brain has finally fuddled from a combination of heat and having to support KK.

http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/09/taylor-swift-white-feminism/

http://www.bustle.com/articles/131069-5-important-reasons-i-cant-love-taylor-swift-anymore

Also from having to say, "yeah, this Bustle article really nails the squad thing."

462 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 18:43 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>460 Having observed her stans in the wild on Tumblr, I think they are mostly as emotionally and intellectually stunted as she is. And just chronologically young.

So, they are mostly too young to recall that the feminist movement has been criticised since the very start for failing to take account of non middle class, non white perspectives (or how you might address that and still be a feminist). Or to have read much actual feminist thought.

As a result they think that white non intersectional feminism is the real deal, and they worship its purveyor in an uncritical way.

They are too young to have been discriminated against on grounds of gender - my personal experience has been that it is only when you get past 30 that you really start to suffer in the workplace (there are fewer women in general as they drop out to have kids, so fewer female voices supporting a different perspective; you don't have that nubile beauty of youth that carries almost all women along for a while and makes them popular with old sexist guys; you start to speak with the authority of age and therefore represent a threat and cease to fit the "cute silent girl" stereotype).

Therefore they don't by and large understand the need for feminism or what it is fighting against (preferential treatment of young pretty blonde girls like TS matters a lot more when she is in your workplace and you are 35).

They want to fit in so they say "I am post feminist" so as not to appear threatening to boys.

They are idealistic. No bad thing in many ways, but they just don't have that ear for dog whistle racism (and other dog whistles that people might blow). They take people at face value.

463 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-19 20:09 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>462 Bless your heart. I would have gone with: They STUPID. I wouldn't have even wasted a verb on them.

464 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 21:02 ID:XVu0oPjZ

>>462 Hah. They don't even know what post-feminist means.
>>457 Corden has very little chill when it comes to big media events and I love him for it.
>>461 The bustle article better states what I was rambling about in >>430 plus Anon astutely pointing out in >>436 that TS is likely espousing Republican values.

An aside, which help strengthened the bully/narcissist explanation. This 2 week old craveonline article, http://idly.craveonline.com/2016/07/breaking-taylor-swift-overly-sensitive-insanely-petty/#/slide/1 , gets to the heart of why CH and TS broke. Which I, needing details, was missing in terms of the timeline. In the second half of the article starting with "So, I guess the big news today..." it explains that she took CH saying in an interview when the song broke that he and she would not be working together as being disrespectful EVEN THOUGH she didn't want them to be seen as working together and went so far as to use a pseudonym. 15 months into a relationship and she snaps.

She needs to have things stated just so or she takes them the wrong way and gets table flipping mad and brings out her bully trifecta of 'my squad,' 'my bf' and 'my money' into the press like fingers-in-the-ears lalalalalalala ICANTHEARYOUOVERTHESOUNDOFMYAWESOMENESS. Borderline personality disorder, maybe?

TH has put two and two together and that's why he's so stifled regarding any mention of her. It's like invisible claws around his neck.

465 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-19 21:15 ID:XVu0oPjZ

For the record, just because I speak out against TS doesn't mean I like KW and KKW. I don't. I feel sorry for their children.

466 Name: Anon : 2016-07-19 23:01 ID:zRGlmuDi

Why is he so extremely pretty in this photo and such a tit in real life?

http://lokiperfection.tumblr.com/post/147656191997

467 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-20 02:22 ID:n8Ob+5ev

Not sure if this one was posted but Cosmo
really let Taylor have it and didn't hold back. Of course Tom's name was pulled into it but they didn't attack him, instead it sounds like they're saying she used him too http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/news/a61508/taylor-swift-playing-the-victim/

468 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-20 04:27 ID:BnzEW/6z

The most recent DM article is just a stream of word vomit based on the IG pic with the two young fans I posted a day or so ago. I won't bother linking to it.

Interesting though is that they're not accepting comments on the article. I've only ever seen the DM do that with articles about current legal cases or issues.

The comments on past articles were a few things: hilarious and consistently anti-TayTo. Hmmmm.

Sorry to report this, anonsy. I know you might be taking out a small loan to cover the tinfoil purchases at this point!!

469 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 04:32 ID:oWssBp/o

>>468 I was just about to post this but then wondered if my computer was malfunctioning... so they do this for litigious cases only?
What has been noticeable since "Christmas in July' is the complete 180 turnaround in DM text. They went from complete shade to no shade. They've been bought.

470 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 04:34 ID:oWssBp/o

We need some kind of tinfoil temple of refuge and prayer.
This combined with the wiping clean of snake and poo emojis and negative comments on IG says TS is attempting to wipe her slate clean

471 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-20 05:13 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>470 I just looked and there are plenty o' poos on her IG. Whoever's responsible for manually removing them - some miserable intern at her PR company - must be taking his 10 minute break.

The DM hasn't been completely kind. They posted about Piers Morgan appearance on morning tv, during which he suggested that they rename TS 'Pinocchio Swift.' But I'll be interested to see if comments are allowed on the next Tayto article and how they swing.

472 Name: Sosorry : 2016-07-20 05:27 ID:bOtEZ/vb

1. The weirdest thing just happened. Did the dailymail article just update to change the title to include TS's "war with KK and KW?" And the fact that TS is "hiding in the hotel room?" Because I don't think that was the title before, it seemed just to be about TH. What game are they playing?

2. At the bottom of the porch photo of TH and TS, it said that it is unknown how long TS will stay in Australia. Are they implyng that TS will not go with TH back to the US at all? B/c staying with TH indefinitely would be an interesting development.

3. There are no new running pics of TH at all. And no joint couple pap walks, of course. Does this mean that this relationship is part real and part PR based? Do you think TH knew he would be dragged into a reality tv feud, and that it is worth it for the publcity?

4.

473 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 05:49 ID:oWssBp/o

>>I assumed they'd clean up the poo while sweeping away the snakes. One emoji at a time I guess.. those poor interns.

Has Piers completely contradicted his arse- licking article defending TS in the height of TayTo? I had no idea. I've only seen this article and one other since news broke of the leaked tapes and both had the air of a daily Nazi bulletin. Blatant propaganda, made even more frightening by the removal of the comments section.

I also look forward to the next Tayto article.

>>472 I don't think the headline has changed but I may not have caught it early.
In regards to point 3, the fact that this PR piece is knowingly planting a fan photo from Sunday and using it to insinuate it was taken after Christmas in July broke (which is not true) makes me wonder if the other fan photo from IG of Tom and a fan in LA is in fact true and they are masking their Houdini escape.
If TH doesn't go jogging tomorrow then I'd say TayTo are in LA. Maybe they took a submarine

474 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-20 06:41 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>473 I doubt Tom would have more than a week to take off from filming so soon after arriving. It's easy to forget these days but he is actually working in Oz. Plus the hair in the IG photo was wrong.

>>468 >>470 I've taken out a small mortgage on my tinfoil cave to build a tinfoil chapel and meditation grotto in the backyard. Votive candles can be lit in prayer for one dollar each. Proceeds will go to the "Hire a Competent Damage Control PR Specialist for Tom Hiddleston" fund.

475 Name: Sosorry : 2016-07-20 06:43 ID:bOtEZ/vb

  1. A brand new dailymail article about a savage "RIP Swift" mural/painting in n Australia just went up, since KK killed her reputation. It's brutal. Sad.
  2. The comment section is officially up on the most recent TH article! Wow. Maybe it was just a mistake.
  3. TH and TS will definitely make a Houdini exit, love that phrase by the way! But that LAX fan photo had TH in a suit jacket, and TH only wears suits when he has a to go directly to an event from the airport, and I don't think that he has an event in LA that I know of, do you?

476 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 06:58 ID:oWssBp/o

>>474 The Hemsworth has had this week off so it's not a reach that Tom has too. Actors are rarely needed on set 24/7, especially in an ensemble film like this where he has at most a bit part, he will have blocks off.
Also, I'm debunking the hair theory. Take another look at that fan photo from Sunday with the kids.
>>475 He does own other clothes, just never wears them. Who are we to know if he has an event in LA. I would have thought Tay Tay would want to flee back to the motherland the moment hell broke loose. Any supportive bf with time off would have flagged down the nearest stealth bomber.
Also, that photo could have been taken in the Gold Coast for all we know, the poster has not confirmed a location or a time, he's just excepted Swiftie gratitudes and deleted comments by doubting ex- Hiddlestoners

477 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-20 07:25 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>476 Tom's shirt is even weirdly wrinkled in the same places as in the Variety photo shoot from April, and I do still think his hair is too short now, particularly on the sides. Tom's body positioning and the framing of the photo are consistent with when he takes selfies. The original poster's friends' comments were along the lines of "LMAO" which to me says the caption about Taylor was some kind of inside joke. But more importantly, nothing will convince me that Tom AND Taylor managed to get through 2-3 airports and commercial airline flights without a more legitimate sighting - not a paparazzi pic, not a fan photo of the both of them, not a tweet from someone on one of their flights.

I wasn't aware Chris had an entire week off - I thought he was just at a resort for the weekend.

478 Name: Anon : 2016-07-20 07:39 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>476 >>477

He does seem to be wearing the same jacket and shirt as on the Variety photos.

The hair didn't seem that different to me from how it looks in recent pics.

But I agree - how has he made it through 3 airports to LA without anyone knowing? Or, if he has, this is even more proof that TayTo are full of shit when it comes to pap strolls.

479 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 07:40 ID:216Sc04H

>>477 I agree it's highly unlikely they Houdini'd. I'll give you the wrinkle receipts and the unlikelihood that he's changed his clothes for the first time in a month but I'm sticking by the hair- that's the one thing I'm good at. I watch follicles and faces like a hawk.
Plus I severely doubt he would have been able to even fake a smile yesterday, let alone allow a selfie in the company of the most mocked woman in the world.

TS is probably up in that luxury suite Colombian line dancing like Scarface, throwing televisions off the balcony and dislodging the the basin from the wall. Like a real rock star. The new hard rock Swift will emerge, complete with a shaved head and running mascara.

480 Name: Anon : 2016-07-20 07:43 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>479 Time to go on Twitter and follow the Emmys accounts. No time to tweet supportively of his GF. Way to go Tom. She must be furious.

481 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-20 07:46 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>479 Maybe Tom wears a hairpiece. I worked for a man once who had a very realistic hairpiece that sat kind of like Tom's hair does, now that I'm thinking about it. He still had his real hair on the sides of his head, but the top was very thinned out so he supplemented it with a piece. It was really high quality and blended well with what was left of his own hair, the only way you could tell it was fake was that the top of his hair always looked the same.

483 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 08:18 ID:216Sc04H

>>480 Has he really been on twitter? Pointing towards more of a dog eat dog relationship than true love.
>>841 This is something I've wondered but I don't think he's gone there yet. He wouldn't be able to jog and sweat profusely with a hairpiece. He's better off having implants and may have already started as it's a slow process.
>>482 This is my hometown and the second 'Taylor Smith' mural to burn my retinas. At least this one is smaller. She is very unpopular here, it's a lot like Portland with the overbearing hipster populace. They will turn out in droves to mock her.
I'm loving the number of commenters, DM writers included, who can't seem to grasp that the misspelling of her last name is intentional.

484 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-20 08:19 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>482 Lol! I wonder if the artist is telling the truth about the last name being a mistake, or if they knew of Taylor's tendency to sue people who offend her and used the wrong last name on purpose.

485 Name: Anon : 2016-07-20 09:21 ID:zRGlmuDi

Here's an interesting little tidbit off tumblr. TS follows cheers-mrhiddleston. Isn't that a thing. She isn't very active on tumblr these days, so I would bet that that follow happened a while back. Has TS had a crush on him for a while? It would also explain the Twitter follow from years back. When he came on the scene in May CH never stood a chance, I bet. That might explain the warp speed (from her perspective anyway). She is always extra and now she is extra with someone she has had an Internet boyfriend crush on.

486 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-20 09:27 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>485 Just looked at cheers-mrhiddleston's tumblr. Whether it was as a crush or as a potential business asset, it looks like Tom's had a target on his back for two years:
http://cheers-mrhiddleston.tumblr.com/post/147679575657/someones-anon-on-a-swift-blog-said-that-youd

487 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-20 09:36 ID:Heaven

>>480 He said they are together and they are happy, 5 days ago, he even used her full name! What more do you want? That he would actually take a stand? ;)

>>485,486 More than a crush I'd say a project, I bet she has a
lost of potential bfs to pursue when the time is right. I also bet that she planned everything for the Met Gala, the topics he would like, how to flatter him "ISTL is a magnificent film, those critics don't know shit!" the invitation to dance.

488 Name: Anon : 2016-07-20 09:38 ID:zRGlmuDi

This is just weak. She could hear voices but she didn't know she was on speaker. Yeah, right. http://m.tmz.com/#article/2016/07/20/taylor-swift-kanye-west-famous-secret-tape/

489 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-20 09:39 ID:tmvu+J8S

>>487 I'm with you on this.

490 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-20 09:39 ID:Heaven

>>487 *lost list

491 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-20 10:10 ID:216Sc04H

>>487 I second the list. Her bf's are always the men of the moment and she no doubt had a tumblr curiosity about the size of Little Hiddles. Hopefully TS didn't look up the bicycle blogs list of his sexual preferences and is only offering anal.
>>488 Surely going legal would be the nail in her coffin but she is the queen of petty. She won't sit this out or hide for much longer.

I wonder if TH was in attendance at the party where EO met TS and made a fool of herself... possibly back in March- she talked about it early May.

492 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-20 10:17 ID:Heaven

>>488 sounds like she is fishing to find out how much more material they have.

493 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-20 10:18 ID:Heaven

>>491 I think now EO doesn't mind so much.

494 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-20 13:59 ID:BnzEW/6z

>>480 Of course he's going to use his twitter account to follow Emmy accounts. That twitter acct is all business now.

Also he's not going to comment on his private life online...some things have to remain sacred. Duh!

495 Name: M : 2016-07-20 14:06 ID:mOu5YVXG

3 mil followers

496 Name: Anon : 2016-07-20 14:27 ID:zRGlmuDi

>>495 Bloody hell, where did they come from? Last I looked he had 1.9m.

Taylor must have spent a packet getting all the fake accounts that follow her to follow him. Still, they will only be temporary and when they split, the followers will all disappear.

497 Name: Anon : 2016-07-20 14:39 ID:zRGlmuDi

A thought - he must be in his way to Comic Con now, surely? Where are the pap pics? Or has TayTay invested in a stealth bomber due to Media Intrusion?

498 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-20 14:40 ID:Heaven

>>496 It has been increasing at the same rate it was increasing before really, maybe slightly quicker but not much. How many are fake or how many are outlets that thought he used twitter I don't have the strength to investigate.

But considering the 70m following TS, he is still kind of irrelevant on socials. Let's face it, who made TH famous on socials were his fans not him.

499 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-20 14:42 ID:Heaven

>>497 he is due on Saturday, he might leave later today (Oz time), using the cover of the night.

500 Name: M : 2016-07-20 15:01 ID:mOu5YVXG

>>496 Before the Swift affair surfaced he had 2.71 mil followers. I'm sure.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.