>>15 thanks - my eyes had glazed over to the extent that I failed to see this...!!!

>>16 And also thanks for the inside line. One of the myths peddled by the stans (especially on CB) is that these things take MONTHS to organise meaning that for example the underpantze editorial was in the pipeline in 2009 or something and had nothing, repeat nothing, to do with desperate thirsty Bond shenanigans.

Similarly they are saying that this editorial must have been in the mind of Interview Mag months before TayTo and that the concept would also have been arranged long before. So he didn't get it because of his association with her, and it wasn't to do damage control, oh no.

Fashion shoots I don't know anything about. But I have had friends who work in publishing and I did think that it sounded like rubbish that these things are set in stone so far ahead. Even a monthly magazine tries to be topical. If they had planned to have a dead-eyed Cara Delvigne on the cover but can switch out nearer the time for someone who they think is more topical and will sell more magazines, due to the joy of desk top publishing, they can and will do it very easily.