Tom Hiddleston (1000)

965 Name: NewAnon : 2017-08-23 08:27 ID:a5CbPO7S

>>939 I think depending on the type of story, Tom could do a lead role. He can do vulnerability and antagonism really well, and a modern mystery or a quiet psychological thriller would be a good fit. I can see him doing roles like Edward Norton in Primal Fear or Jake Gyllenhaal in Zodiac. Traditional Tom Cruise/ Bruce Willis type action roles or even romcoms are not Hiddlebum's forte. He can fit in a Wes Anderson comedy pretty well too.

>>944 Credibility with the public is part of it as well because of is the actor worth the hassle in $$$ when it comes to production costs. That's why some actors with serious substance abuse issues will keep getting good gigs even though they pose a huge insurance liability, because the public adores them and studios/ producers feel it's worth the risk in $$$. Tom is an idiot with how he blew his chances. That tanktop was nothing compared to how he arrived in Oz with Taylor and turned the entire Thor3 shoot about himself and Taylor. I'm pretty sure Marvel had to spent extra to ensure the privacy of the closed set, and Tom must have gotten some sort of warning about not allowing his relationship circus to follow him on set.

>>951 Even if you give Tom the benefit of the doubt and say TNM provoked the Bond rumors, if he was truly in consideration for the role, he immediately would have shut it all down because of the NDA. That's why you never find out about actors auditioning for whatever movies until it's about to go into pre-production. Likely scenario is what >>954 said. Tom wanted Bond and thought if he put it out there in the media that his Pine makes him a viable candidate for Bond, he would get noticed by Broccoli and company. He could have landed some other role in the Bond universe if he had networked instead of leaking and stunting.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.