>>645 There was debate over whether or not a relationship this short should be included at all, but I think you're right - it seems that as long as it can be cited, it's fair game. Though I do think he should be directly quoted like he was in that article, complete with notes of stammering and awkward laughter.
>>646 I went and had another look. Tom's page is semi-protected, which means that it can be edited by any registered Wikipedia user, which I am - should I go vandalize it? I could change "Hiddleston won the light-hearted UK award Rear of the Year 2016" to "Hiddleston was named Ass of the Year 2016."
(Note: I am not going to vandalize his page. If someone does this, it was not me.)