ITT we discuss [GIRLS] in our SUPERSTRUCTURE [Tittays] (10)

1 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5928 22:20

（　・∀・） Girls in the superstructure - An impossibility or a fact?

There is a Catherine Symons in the DQN facebook group (http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2212345276&ref=ts), for example. Some pictures of her (That she has already deleted) show that she didn't look AT ALL like a girl that would fit in our beloved superstructure - ie hot (!!!).

So, what do you think?

2 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 03:32

I think that this is a horrible thread and that you should feel bad for making it.

3 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 05:42

that group is obviously fake, it has more than six people

4 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 13:31

I've read many reports about males or other females dopplganging people's photos on the web and impersonating hot chicks (sometimes males) I assume this is the case.

5 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 15:05

A girl actually told me about the superstructure.

6 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 15:44

I don't feel comfortable with this thread. Please cease discussion immediately.

7 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 16:15

Calm down, mate. I think it's a really comforting fact that good looking girls frequent this place. It means that somewhere outside our basements there are neat NEET girls who'd possibly love to live the VIP lifestyle of a superstructure member together with you. Sex included, if you've got the eros (you'll understand what i mean after having read the part of the sympozion where platon talks to diotima. don't be fooled by wikipedia, that does not necessarily mean platonic love)

8 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 21:03

not cool, >>1, not cool.

9 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 21:14

I thought about joining that group, and then my desire for anonymity won out and I didn't.

10 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5929 22:31

i joined that group even though this thread is fucking creepy

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: