>>37
Explain the relevance. Nobody here is saying ANYTHING about children.

>>38
Get the fuck out of my thread. "Answer this questio nor you lose the debate."? No.

As for your question: nice bait-and switch. Nobody wants their children to breathe in smoke, and nobody says they should have to. This argument has nothing about second-hand smoke, it's about whether or not people should be able to use drugs in the privacy of their own homes.