I must add that the previous three posters may not realize it gets difficult to refer an individual as "⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃" for several reasons. The foremost being the wide majority of BU-N in here, and secondarily the unpronounceable nature of that series of Unicode characters.
Ergo, utilizing >>30 as a proper noun is justified in this informal atmosphere.