ITT we correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context (273)

97 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5068 08:52

>>96's use of "it is" to introduce a dependent clause that later refers to the antecedent is clumsy, and would be better reworded. For example,

> Whether these pronouns "this" and "that" require capitalization is questionable.
Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.