>>777
The pre-WW1 Russian Navy sounds like something out of a canceled sequel to Duck Soup.
> reportedly firing more than 500 shells without hitting anything.
> twenty minutes bombarding a fleet of fishing boats without discovering the nature of their target.
> accidentally severed the city's underwater telegraph cable with her anchor
how the christ did these guys make it around spain without crashing
a very important thinker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola
>>785
btw I don't agree with him on EVERYTHING, just some things
it's ok to take bits and pieces from someone's ideology without agreeing with every single thing
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger#/media/File:Badger_species_map.png
the time America almost nuked itself by accident
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1961_Goldsboro_B-52_crash
>>846, I honestly don't see why on earth a person with a minority complaint should be expected to "just drop it".
Or do I just not understand how Wikipedia works and what that article meant?
Yes, I noticed:
> This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
>>868 I'm so happy you posted this, you made my day ( ߁)/
>>869
check out the other places in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Closed_cities, most of them have pretty cool flags (probably because many didn't exist before soviet times and so the flag wasn't invented by some medieval noble who thought slapping a hawk or a stag onto some solid color was the epitome of graphic design)