The legality of rorikon (37)

18 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-27 12:58 ID:Heaven

Even using the term "victimless crime" to describe underage sexual drawings is loaded. Art is not a crime (artistic value thankfully satisfies the Miller test), and making it or consuming it is no crime, either. Nobody is being harmed or exploited by creating such works, and to paraphrase one Supreme Court Justice, "if freedom of speech means anything, it means protection for the speech we hate - not just speech we agree with."

It is important to fight tooth and nail attempts to criminalize any type of art, otherwise the same tactics will eventually be applied to anything deemed potentially offensive to someone.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.