Requests/Feedback @4-ch

Do you have a request for the website? Do you have something to say about how things work within the site, or want a new board or feature? This is the place to come to.

This is not the place to ask for requests for anything not 4-ch related. Your post/thread will be deleted if it's deemed as off-topic.

Rules · 規則
基本的には英語の使用を強く希望します。ただ日本語板の場合は日本語か英語。
Board look: Blue Moon Buun Futaba Headline Mercury Pseud0ch Toothpaste
1: This website has been completely destroyed apart from DQN. (5) 2: [Spam] Moderation requests [Cleanup] (585) 3: Clearly DQN should be more VIP Quality (35) 4: fucking museum (16) 5: [Policy] Title [DQN] (6) 6: [Request] Debate Board (11) 7: Bold text threads ? (4) 8: [adverts] (19) 9: requesting removal of thread (3) 10: 【Unworkable】Thread overlap (3) 11: Write me a list of things broken and wrong with the site. (85) 12: Permasage (5) 13: I request for 4ch to become less restrictive again (17) 14: [Confusion] Spam and Troll Policy (2) 15: [Suggestion]Drugs board (5) 16: Can we just ban threads about /b/? (5) 17: 403 Forbidden (3) 18: Make moses wordfilter to faggotry. (8) 19: Nuke Romance (4) 20: Trigger-Happy Mods? (17) 21: Can we split /politics/ (13) 22: [HARAMBE] (18) 23: Appoint moderators or janitors, PLEASE! (14) 24: change DQN name (6) 25: Meta talk about the Imageboard (25) 26: Why does 4-ch still use frames (6) 27: Spam prevention (3) 28: delete my profile and post (5) 29: /sexual/ links (12) 30: Change the landing page (13) 31: Page that shows all the new posts across boards (16) 32: 🖕 (5) 33: Suggestion/Bug fix: Closing tags at the end of a post (10) 34: LOL (14) 35: There should be an etiquette page. (3) 36: [SSL][HTTPS]I'd love to access 4-ch.net securely.[Encryption][Using 4-ch at work] (13) 37: [Handheld] The mobile reader support and requests thread (73) 38: Switching to weabot (14) 39: Roleplay Board? (4) 40: Here's an idea for how 4Channel can become an NNTPChan frontend while still keeping images disabled (7)

This website has been completely destroyed apart from DQN. (5)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-25 19:57 ID:MNSJvuOj

Ever since the faggoty Harambeposter has been bumping up old threads nobody wants to post in, it destroys semi-active boards and turns them into wastelands. This entire fucking website has been destroyed by this annoying poster.

At this point, I don't see why all boards shouldn't just be deleted and have only 2 or 3 boards up.

2 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-26 20:49 ID:bINvwUuP

I'd rather they be archived and closed than deleted. Otherwise agreed.

3 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-27 07:29 ID:tNkOF0/O

is there a previous copy that can be reverted to before the spammer struck?

4 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-27 12:33 ID:GkJxMpoM

>>2

I agree. Archive them and leave only 2 or 3 boards open.

5 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-27 19:53 ID:bINvwUuP

Copying my post from DQN

There's one feature that might actually improve textboards. Index the front page dynamically based on the last non-saged post, allowing the page order to be restored after bump spam is deleted. There's not a slow forum around that wouldn't be improved by this. Backend mod tools and the previously mentioned bump spam negation are all that is needed. Ylilauta is one of the few sites I know that actually does this properly.

Do this.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

[Spam] Moderation requests [Cleanup] (585)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2006-06-15 12:32 ID:4tY/FN8M

If you spot something that needs moderator attention, post about it here.

Specify the exact thread and post number(s) if possible.

576 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-01-07 13:07 ID:NChdSiJ+

done thanks

577 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-01-11 05:29 ID:dqELVk52

578 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-01-13 19:33 ID:dqELVk52

579 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-01-20 11:05 ID:Cvi25vnO

580 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-02-01 07:30 ID:WCpb4FHk

581 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-02-01 11:07 ID:Heaven

582 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-02-03 14:27 ID:WCpb4FHk

583 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-03 17:43 ID:OrsGxIlg

done

Post too long. Click to view the whole post or the thread page.
Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

Clearly DQN should be more VIP Quality (35)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-10-22 14:44 ID:KUUUWSTx

I have a few suggestions:

We should copy 2channel "soko" and "shuffle" commands.
Soko throws the thread down to the bottom.
Shuffle throws the thread in a random position.

Its genial!

26 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-21 21:50 ID:Heaven

>>24
Neither is >>15 , bloody hypocrite.

27 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-22 04:27 ID:Heaven

>>26
Yes, >>15 was a question. Good job! Now tell me what you think >>25 is?

28 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-22 15:20 ID:Heaven

I don't know but I think >>27 is brain damage, considering it thinks >>15 had any intent of asking a question.

29 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-22 18:59 ID:Heaven

>>28
I'm sorry, that was not the answer we were looking for. For review, a question is something that ends in a question mark. For example, this is a question? Please try again another day.

30 Name: bps!!+u1+mB+S (Admin) : 2015-12-25 04:12 ID:miAJHmVv

Thanks for the feedback guys. According to >>18 the feature is more unpopular than it is popular, so I am inclined to hold back for now. At any rate, I think that >>23 closely matches my opinion on the matter.

My conclusions so far:

  1. if any of the two features are implemented, it would only be on DQN
  2. both soko and shuffle, if implemented, would only force to position 10 and randomly place between position 1 and 10, respectively. That is, it would not apply to the entire thread list.
  3. soko appears to be more open to abuse, by being repeatedly used to silence a particular thread. I don't particularly relish the necessity to police this, either.

31 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-12-26 00:54 ID:x62LSCuk

>soko appears to be more open to abuse, by being repeatedly used to silence a particular thread

I'm not sure if there's anything to silence on DQN

32 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-01-02 03:22 ID:Heaven

Since "Nuke DQN" is the most popular choice in that poll, maybe this would be a better idea: If someone posts on DQN with "nuke" in the link field, nuke the board.

33 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-05-30 04:33 ID:Heaven

I know it's been decided but just in case a doubt befouls your mind, DON'T DO THIS.

34 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-14 14:27 ID:5U/OfL3E

dicks out for Harambe

35 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-25 16:35 ID:GL1hT5rE

>>34
deal with this bps you lazy nigger

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

fucking museum (16)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-09-08 14:52 ID:ZCU131ak

nuke all boards under News, no one uses them

there's a lot of threads that should be on /tech/ but were made in /code/ cause no-one uses /tech/

what was the point of having both /net/ and /iaa/ again

del /hobbies/

del /dqn/ just to see waht happens

7 Name: bps!!+u1+mB+S (Admin) : 2015-09-20 22:29 ID:HFJZMXob

This has been a controversial subject for a long time.

  1. I'm sympathetic to the idea of archiving all the existing threads which haven't been active for 6-12 months or so.
  2. Merging boards is a big move. I have been considering other ways to solve these problems of inactivity. Should they fail, then maybe we can try merging boards.

Stay tuned...

8 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-09-21 14:35 ID:BgdDQ93x

>>7
Thanks for the reply bps, good to hear you're considering it

9 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-09-21 18:20 ID:Heaven

>>7
12 months is pretty short. 3 or 4 years would be more reasonable.

10 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-09-23 16:01 ID:1sfG/nWz

I like the idea of merging /code/ with /tech/. And why does /tech/ say "Tech Support" in the frame anyway?

11 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-09-29 02:31 ID:Heaven

>>10
That's how it (inevitably) wound up being used.

12 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-09-29 03:44 ID:QjANyrky

My fear is that removing/merging the boards would just make the site 'feel' smaller and even more uncomfortable in the long run. Without posters, even one board will seem slow. Even DQN.

Sadly, the only solution is advertising somewhere OTHER than 4chan. The only thing they have to offer any more are replies about how this place, surprise, isn't 4chan.

I don't mind the museum atmosphere, not posting sometimes can be a virtue.

13 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-18 23:14 ID:+l6w5Gxb

>>12
The only problem with inactivity is that it tends to scare off new users

14 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-21 07:29 ID:Heaven

IIchan is dead, that thing that replaced it is pretty dead too.
I doubt drastic changes to the site will encourage consistent long term activity, that will only come with a resurgence in the interest in 2ch style bbs in English.
No way to fight the decline in interest really other than becoming tastemakers.

15 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-11-28 22:19 ID:Heaven

>>13
why would we want the sort of users who are scared off by the idea of thinking before posting?

16 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-13 21:49 ID:TCEJKkVO

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

[Policy] Title [DQN] (6)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2008-01-23 14:11 ID:Emgri4CQ

You probably know about the big album project that emerged from the elitist superstructure - Title. It's nearing completion (21 out of the 29 songs have been done, and the remaining is easy and actively worked on). Once it's done, we'll distribute the album all over the internets.

Since we consider that DQN-kun wrote every DQN song, we intend to credit the album to something like "DQN-kun and the Elitist Superstructure of DQN" - and to provide a link to 4-ch.net in the album tracklist.
It would look something like this: http://tanasinn.info/wiki/Really_Long_Song_Project#Cover_artwork

So I thought I'd ask this before we actually do it: is it OK for us to clearly mention 4-ch.net in the project?

PROS: Influx of new people, including good posters
CONS: Influx of new people, including idiots

Original recording project thread: http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1188328128/63-
Original really long song thread: http://archives.4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1149386526/

2 Name: Squeeks : 2008-01-23 14:40 ID:0wI2fd3g

That's pretty awesome. Go for it.

3 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2008-06-01 22:37 ID:NgLQ8Qlv

Is it already complete by now? I wanna listen to it :(

4 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2008-06-04 15:57 ID:57agIAU5

The last two guys have been stalling for months ;_;

5 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2008-06-04 21:13 ID:Y/PMfMB6

>>4
damnit! :(

6 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-13 20:08 ID:QLnZXvt5

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

[Request] Debate Board (11)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-06-30 02:46 ID:b/6G1exs

I was wondering about having a debate board added to 4-ch. It would spark some interest and discussion in the site as long as there are some strict guidelines put into place. I'm sure that the people of 4-ch would like to give their opinion on the world's pressing topics! The only major problems I can see are people being off topic and trolls, but as long as there is a guideline for people not to flame, it should work out OK. If anything, it would bring in more people. I don't even know if there is an anonymous board with a place for debate yet (I'm sure there is somewhere), but this is just a suggestion.

2 Name: Squeeks : 2007-07-01 15:14 ID:DvLEaFhd

Well, in the mean time, if you can keep the conversation free of excessive stupidity and trolls, use /politics for politic debates, and /science for scientific/reglious/moral debates.

3 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-03 00:18 ID:Heaven

>>2

> free of excessive stupidity [...] politic debates

4 Name: Squeeks : 2007-07-03 18:47 ID:DvLEaFhd

Stop using the internet if you are seeking less stupidity, please.

5 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-06 01:48 ID:Heaven

>>4
Now that's some good advice.

6 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-06 09:13 ID:Heaven

>>4
When politic debates are involved, that will not help :(

7 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-07 20:46 ID:Heaven

>>6 lol

8 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-08 11:07 ID:70tNrbrq

Debate boards always turn into religious flame-fests. If you want to be reduced to arguing like a 12 year old over the existence of fictional characters and a storybook and why you believe in them or not, go yell it out on the street.

9 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-08 18:04 ID:Heaven

>>8
You saying that God is fake punk?

Really though, I believe that >>4 answers the question. It's not like people are going to go crazy after this, and if you don't like the debates then you can just ignore them.

10 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-07-10 20:35 ID:jkHKFZ76

>>8-9 FIGHT!
deet deet deet, de de deet, deet deet deet, de de deet, deet deet deet, de de deet, deet deet deet de de, de det.

11 Post deleted.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

Bold text threads ? (4)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-03-21 23:11 ID:ZWUtwL5q

Wouldn't it look better if threads you have answered (and got reply) have [b]bold names[/b] ?

2 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-03-24 19:41 ID:Heaven

maybe

3 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2007-03-24 19:42 ID:Heaven

also lol @ bbcode.

4 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-13 15:17 ID:kq4z+NkW

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

[adverts] (19)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-09-30 12:25 ID:ZRmC3k7e

Lets face it bepis, 4-ch is dying. Why don't we try and advertise the site on multiple other websites, or if worse comes to worse.. Make a 4chan ad, shudders.

10 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-10-14 20:36 ID:uPTE8eT2

> durr hurr the site works fine it's (((outdated)))
> please make it some terrible javascript 2.0 thing where nothing makes any sense and its loading asynchroniously so you posts don't show up

fuck off

11 Post deleted.

12 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-10-15 15:37 ID:+PzwstaG

>>9 yeah this board works great

13 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-10-16 09:44 ID:Heaven

>>10
Who the fuck are you quoting

14 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-10-16 16:16 ID:uPTE8eT2

>>13
Who are you quoting

15 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-10-16 17:47 ID:Heaven

ugh

16 Post deleted.

17 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2016-10-17 18:11 ID:ZRmC3k7e

>>10

have to agree, the site should stay as it is.

18 Post deleted.

19 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-13 13:49 ID:IaEjoQoS

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

requesting removal of thread (3)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2009-02-03 08:18 ID:DMc7qNAG

Accidentally posted a "Daddy's Little Girl roleplay" thread in the romance section, before remembering that it would fit much better in the "Sexuality" board. I copied-and-pasted the text into the Sexuality board already, so if you can delete the original mistake in Romance, that'd be appreciated.

Thanks.

2 Name: 4-ch mod : 2009-02-10 07:24 ID:pLTExQ6c

It seems that the mods have been negligent here. Sorry about that.

3 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-12 22:20 ID:1t8xfLMj

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

【Unworkable】Thread overlap (3)

1 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2015-07-23 02:17 ID:utwRtjMC

There's a lot of overlap with current boards and there always will be, the only solution is to be able to make a thread on multiple boards, using Unix hardlinks.

2 Name: bps!!+u1+mB+S (Admin) : 2015-08-07 12:27 ID:Heaven

That sounds quite confusing.

I don't think Channel4 is ready for such extreme levels of change.

3 Name: Anonymous Advisor : 2017-03-12 16:38 ID:Ec9il2ca

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification:

New thread

Title:
Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: