If you spot something that needs moderator attention, post about it here.
Specify the exact thread and post number(s) if possible.
thread selling fake passports:
proly should be deleted considering what kind of trouble they could be used for.
response 4 is racist
Please delete no. 16
I have a few suggestions:
We should copy 2channel "soko" and "shuffle" commands.
Soko throws the thread down to the bottom.
Shuffle throws the thread in a random position.
I want more information: is this
just to the bottom of the page
Just to the bottom of the thread list
All the way down at the bottom of 'all threads'
I'm in favour of shuffle in any case!
I forgot. I could swear it was "all the way down at the bottom of 'all threads'".
That's a bit extreme compared to sage. Down to the bottom of /index would make more sense, as it's still there to be seen if someone wants to rescue it, but one bump from an older thread or one new thread and it gets nudged out of sight.
Also, the bottom of all threads is a nice place to go to for some history. Randomly soko'd threads in the mix will ruin the feeling of being thrust several years into the past.
I feel the same way about shuffle, up til now people haven't really been able to mess up the thread order that much, and giving them the ability to randomly place threads at a new position in the full list seems like a huge step towards making threads undiscovered. I feel if these are implemented they should both be limited to the first page and not the whole thread index.
I think downvotes are more complicated but then again I don't use Reddit so take my opinion with a pinch of salt.
imo 4-ch would make for super lucky immensely pleasurable mobile browsing environment if the frames were ditched in favor of a drop menus.
I'd love to be able to post messages from the phone, it don't require anything special since phones can handle POST-requests just as any other browser...
Can we look at source code?
Not trying to sound impatient or anything, but is the ability to reply under this mode going to be added at some point?
I would love to be able to see 4-ch's source code to try to make it more mobile. As of tonight I've decided to become active here again, and am slightly disappointed that i can still see my comments from over a year ago are on the requests front page thing. Is Squeeks still around?
Hey Squeeks, when clicking a citeted post like >>1 it still opens in normal kareha. Can this be fixed please? I am in fact posting this in normal kareha from my phone. Otherwise, wonderful job.
/sexual/ is still listed
nuke all boards under News, no one uses them
there's a lot of threads that should be on /tech/ but were made in /code/ cause no-one uses /tech/
what was the point of having both /net/ and /iaa/ again
del /dqn/ just to see waht happens
Agreed. Perhaps we should rather make it a year, but the antique threads are what makes 4-ch give off that dead vibe. If a thread hasn't been replied to for a year, then I don't see the problem with archiving it and having whoever wants to discuss that topic again make a new thread.
A-are you there bps?
This has been a controversial subject for a long time.
Thanks for the reply bps, good to hear you're considering it
12 months is pretty short. 3 or 4 years would be more reasonable.
I like the idea of merging /code/ with /tech/. And why does /tech/ say "Tech Support" in the frame anyway?
That's how it (inevitably) wound up being used.
My fear is that removing/merging the boards would just make the site 'feel' smaller and even more uncomfortable in the long run. Without posters, even one board will seem slow. Even DQN.
Sadly, the only solution is advertising somewhere OTHER than 4chan. The only thing they have to offer any more are replies about how this place, surprise, isn't 4chan.
I don't mind the museum atmosphere, not posting sometimes can be a virtue.
The only problem with inactivity is that it tends to scare off new users
IIchan is dead, that thing that replaced it is pretty dead too.
I doubt drastic changes to the site will encourage consistent long term activity, that will only come with a resurgence in the interest in 2ch style bbs in English.
No way to fight the decline in interest really other than becoming tastemakers.
because BPS added it with no prior warnings. Like a UFO crashing in your backyard andsomehow nobody noticed.
Why don't we make sage invisible like on Futaba Channel?
Mouse over a blue name, you'll see
It's visible on the rest of this website, so I see no reason to buck the trend and make it hidden.
At some point you should change the default name.
Why do we want to become a NNTPChan frontend again?
Well you can "tag" your thread however you like, but the most effective way of communicating moderation requests will always be by posting on this board.
It seems everytime I bring up a big problem, 4-ch'ers think it's a good time to go ahead and blurt out all the little problems, so on Monday I get some time off work. So that means, I'll have some time to fix minor things, etc. So, list for me, in as much detail necessary all the things that are broken, missing, not working, changes etc and I'll try to get them all done on Monday. I might also look at taking down the site for a while, upgrading all the boards to the latest copy of Kareha etc.
And please, don't shit this thread up, I will be liberal in deleting posts that are blatantly offtopic or stupid.
Captcha is being a whore on /dqn/
Disregard that one (i made that post,) it's working now.
Like this: <a href="http://wakaba.c3.cx/sup/kareha.pl/1439382507/" />
With formatting set to HTML obviously
I didn't know that you can just type out the link
If you have strong (or weak) opinions on any of the following things, I would like to hear what you think!
I'll monitor this for a long time and act accordingly if people have any input.
Hi again guys. I want to ask your opinion on a new feature:
For each post, how about putting at the bottom of it (or at the end of the line with name, date, ID, etc.) a list of posts that quote it? For example if >>2 and >>3 quote >>1, then underneath >>1 there would be something like: Replies: >>2, >>3.
Let me know what you think!
I find both suggestions sound. Make it so.
I'm not particularly fussed either way about the listing replies thing, but the hovering to show posts sounds like an excellent idea.
why was >>/2 deleted but not >>/3 (>>/2 was deleted after >>/3 was posted IIRC)
were all posts from that IP mass-deleted without the mod seeing the thread?
or do I remember wrong?
I've an idea: add 'VORUDEMOTO' to the spam filter
We just got an imageboard without any warning
Oh, and for transparency I wish to describe the two methods by which somebody might get banned:
A ban results in the IP address being blocked from making posts on the entirety of the website.
And, I have removed the ban from the guy that emailed me today at 20.31 CET.