> I reject your assertion that the burden is on me, however, the proof that God exists is that without Him you couldn’t prove ANYTHING. God is the necessary precondition for intelligibility, intelligibility exists, therefore God exists.

You're cherrypicking the parts of other peoples arguments you want to respond to, and ignore the rest, which is not a good thing to do. Go back to >>48, then try this again, please.

> What is your evidence that the human reasoning you use to validate this evidence, is itself valid?

Generally, it is based on logic and has served me pretty well so far, as it has served you, I assume, and specifically, you don't seem to be able to make a point.

> Hardly, God has characteristics which account for sentience, personality, invariance, among other things, the universe does not.

Apparently, this universe does have all the neccesary preconditions for life complex enough to be sentient to develop sentient life, as is shown by me and you existing. As for the why, see, for example, >>48 and followups. (Also, even if you were right, that would still be only a proof of any god, not the christian one, not even a single one - there could be many of them.)