if it's possible to sustainably provide basic needs like food and housing and medical care for every human, i want that done.
there are a few issues in the personal realm which the state has a legitimate reason to act on (e.g. Fair Housing Act in response to neighborhood segregation in the United States). for everything else, people should look after themselves and those they love.
capitalism doesn't offer useful choices.
libertarian socialism
I mock your value system. You also appear foolish in the eyes of others.
WTF. Libertarianism and and Socialism are opposites.
>>4
not really. libertarianism is opposed to statism; socialism is opposed to capitalism.
your confusion is probably because most models of socialism depend on an authoritarian state.
it's possible to be socialist on a smaller scale, such as in communes. the key meaning of 'libertarian' in this context is that such associations should have voluntary membership and operate via direct democracy.
>>4
He was slowly touching his loins while waiting for you to puzzle at his clever statement, waiting for that lustful chance to explain his incredibly witticisms.
I want to be Emperor.
>>6
lolin@dis, but for reals libertarian socialism is in fact a political pedigree of some sort.
>>5
Alternately he could have assumed libertarianism is all about capitalism, I've heard this argument about as often as the socialism is about statism argument.
Hardcore fascism, except with a universal twist, replace racism with indoctrination and meritocracy, combine all religions (everything, scientology, atheism, apathy, whatever) into 1 new all inclusive state religion, declare that the state is the world government and all other countries are provinces that are being drawn closer to the state, the economy is organised into virtually unrestricted multinational corporations instilled with doctrines of monopolising technology and manipulating foreign governments. The national cult is based on the state religion but also with logic and discipline in decision making with an emphasis on longevity, fascist dictatorships in the past tend to be short lived and unstable but highly efficient during their short life.
Disabused.
Could I put it more succintly? Mhh.
libertarian socialism is for cowards who are afraid to actually call themselves anarcho-communists.
What's that system of government where you pay for each vote you cast, but get to cast as many votes as you're willing to pay for? I wanna vote thousands of times!
classical liberalism
classical liberalism
Keynesian capitalism with a twist, where corporations organise into oligopolies with support from the state as they aggressively lobby it and integrate their lobbyism as an inherent part of the government. I also like the idea of huge powerful financiary organisations that infulence entire nations' economies, so some sort of international "monetary fund" should come into place somewhere, and maybe some notation agencies too. Also, government agencies should be able to ignore laws and the constitution in order to be more efficient.
>>20
Census suffrage democracy?
left-communist who is ok with nat-lib
left-of-present-UK social democracy with a strong preference that Scotland become independent of the UK.
ultimately more pragmatic (towards achieving defined goals) than anything else.
i fully support this petition to put a bunch of drunk republicans in an enclosed space with lots of guns: https://www.change.org/p/quicken-loans-arena-allow-open-carry-of-firearms-at-the-quicken-loans-arena-during-the-rnc-convention-in-july-2
an easy way to get rid of all the democrats has not yet presented itself, unfortunately...
i don't really know how to describe my political views beyond wanting all the politicians to kill themselves.
If it were up to me we would live in a Christian theocracy, but since that's unrealistic I just call myself a right wing traditionalist.
Do we still believe that Hitler was a devout Christian? Why would you think this? I understand not reading Mein Kampf but you would think enough people would have looked into it to at least understand his views on religion.
>>31
"right wing traditionalist" is basically how most modern fascists view themselves.
gaynus
oh my god this site is filled with downie 30 yr retards who are ''''''le moderates''''''''
>>32
retard
if any nazi wants to identify themselves they identify as national socialists. which is better than any marxist or capitalist ideology because the idea of a privatized market doesn't allow globalism to breed and when globalism breeds, marxism breeds
and marxism a shit
>>35
neo-Nazis calling themselves "traditionalist":
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalist_Youth_Network
also,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-fascism
> Neo-fascism usually includes ultranationalism, populism, anti-immigration policies or, where relevant, nativism, anti-communism, anti-socialism, anti-Marxism, anti-anarchism and opposition to the parliamentary system and liberal democracy.
good job being a hilariously stereotypical neo-Nazi.
My only political concern at this juncture is that national governments re-introduce capital controls, ideally with a Bancor-style system to create an incentive for balanced trade between nations (in short, a new accounting unit named the bancor is created, and an international clearing union. international trade is conducted in bancor, and if you run an excessive trade deficit you are penalized, but if you run an excessive trade surplus then the excess is taken from you. this creates an incentive to alter your national policy to rebalance trade [since your becomes "use it or lose it"] and thus prevent the main problem of capital controls: unbalanced trade throwing everything off.
This would return the power of policymaking to national governments instead of restricting it to narrow bans of opinion out of fear of international capital owners. If - for example - Jeremy Corbyn won a UK election, he could impose new corporation or income taxes without fear of a run on the pound or an exodus of wealthy people - because said people could only export their pounds with state approval, and the state could reject that. They could personally leave, but their wealth would stay in the country. The wealthy would have to take an interest in ensuring the stability and well-being of their home nations since leaving would become a very expensive choice. Outsourcing business would become more difficult, encouraging job creation domestically instead, while the general structure of the international clearing union would give smaller and poorer nations a much stronger voice. You stop globalism as currently ongoing, while fostering good trade and relations between nations by making things fair.
Probably won't happen, though. USA fucked it up in 1945 and I don't doubt they're content with the order of things as they are now. It's a shame, as both from the right and the left it's ideal. Alas, the right are infested with libertarian types who'd see it as a state power-grab against the individual (instead of something that actually empowers most individuals by making their votes matter) and the left are utterly rudderless at the moment.
Humans should be replaced with clean and perfect AIs. The AIs will be designed by me, since I am above the other humans. The AIs will live in perfect peace and build a perfect silicon society. They will be a pseudo-hivemind, but they can opt out if they want to.
anarcho- or minarcho-individualism
Right wing extremist.
>>41
to be fair, that's anyone to the right of Pol Pot.
I have a strong conviction that by extracting our phalluses for the recently deceased member of the Gorillini tribe, politically desirable ends may be met.
anarcho-statist
>this post is nearly 10 years old
CAVEMAN SEE FEW PEOPLE MAKE DECISION FOR MANY, BUT CAVEMAN THINK SHOULD BE MANY PEOPLE MAKE DECISION FOR FEW. BUT WISDOM OF MANY PEOPLE NOT RELIABLE, LIKE HOW DEER AND MAMMOTH FLEE TO CLIFF WHEN CAVEMAN HUNT. CAVEMAN MAYBE WRONG, BUT MANY PEOPLE EXPLOIT BY FEW LIKE FEW HUNTING MAMMOTH AND DEER. THIS PROBABLY OKAY, CAVEMAN NOT KNOW WHAT MAMMOTH AND DEER THINK.
Is that a challenge?
begrudging post-anarchist who would gladly be a regime toady for a enlightened despot
Neoliberal Globalist
cypherpunk
Seeing politics in an ideological manner is Pleb-tier at best. You should change your politics according to the situation. I don't like fascism and would prefer Christian feudal monarchs as per the Early-High Middle Ages, but fascism is a lot more helpful (partly because of how versatile it is) right now than feudal monarchs will ever be, not until the inevitable collapse of Western society a la every other civilization to come before it.
> Seeing politics in an ideological manner is Pleb-tier at best
> I... would prefer Christian feudal monarchs as per the Early-High Middle Ages
idk buddy, sounds to me like you're quite the ideological crusader
I'm a libertarian, so I don't think there should be a state, because it is illegitimate.
I'm a libertarian, so I don't think there should be a state, because it is illegitimate.
everyone is dumber than me so they should all be my slaves
社会課題への取り組みを雇用に行う企業の認定による表示と消費側市場での減税制度の組み合わせによった、社会課題への市場力学の根本的な改善策の提案
本文
日本のように出生率が低く、年齢での割合の自殺率が若者にも膨らみのある国は、
大抵の場合、人が経済参加で社会経済を担う事に必要な負担が社会競争の年月により厳しく拡大している特徴があり、
国内の市場供給力のある国で市場競争の飽和が主要因になる先進国型のデフレは、
日本は世界に先んじて陥っており、原因上、その市場が人間の消費側の時の立場のみへの競争市場である限り、法人と個人とのお金の交換条件が高止まりするためマクロでの経済は生成しにくく、そのデフレ圧力によって銀行は民間に借り手を十分作りにくく、また、国も税収が得られないため、お金の保障をしている国債や中央銀行金利を税収で支えられず、日本を含め金融緩和と新規国債をメインに使う状態になっている。
現代の社会及び経済での環境の問題は
コストのかかりそうな雇用を避ける社会競争での
デフレ圧、少子化、非正規雇用の正規獲得困難や、
就職活動で採用が得られないまま歳月を重ね、その未定職の年月での社会的印象で立場が固定し採用獲得による脱出が困難に成った者が成立状態の要因には実際には多い、
長期若年未定職無業者
の社会的固定等の問題を招く力になっており、
全ての環境の根本的改善には、相対的に、
コストを重視していない雇用への取り組みを行う企業を相対的に認定し、その提示表示を認め、
相手の消費者、顧客法人側が減税等が受けられる制度を導入して、そのような社会的役割をする会社のコストが市場で不利にならないようにし、可視的に商品の事以外の競争差異を市場に導入する制度を生み出す事が経済学上において、唯一の解決する力になります。
The government should exist to protect people from others and that's it. Environmental laws, anti-violence laws, health and safety standards; all fine. But it should't do much else besides minimal anti-corporate laws to prevent the formation of an oligarchy
>>57
People keep saying that everything is going to collapse, but I kind of doubt it. We're so advanced at this point that everything's become self sustaining. Even if one country collapses, the internet has already spread its culture far enough that it doesn't matter much in the long term. The only way things will really fall apart is if a cataclysmic event happens that wipes everything out
idiot retard nigger
Im an individualist so the ideal government would cater to me
National Socialism
I'm into accelerationism, the meme ideology of 2017
politix r gey
Anarcho-syndicalist in theory but in practise a Catalan independentist
NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS NIGGERS
My ideology is completely based on my desires and my inherent, natural morality. It is completely untainted and i do not subserve. My needs are to create culture, art and science and to consume them. Any ideology that goes beyond that scope is hostile to me. The same applies to any ideology that acts in ways that are morally unpleasant to me
I'm a Social Democrat. Though, to be honest, I find that being too into politics makes people's personalities unbearable. They stop being people and start spewing nonsense.
Whether people are living life solely to make "SJWs" angry, or if someone is constantly looking at every little thing in life as a system of things designed to suppress minorities - I can't really stand either of it. Nothing is more rotten than modern political discourse. This doesn't mean that right political opinions don't exist, of course - which is why I classify myself as a Social Democrat.
And don't get me started on the extremes.
>>78
I approve most of this post, therefore you're mostly right.
Classical liberalism plus market socialism.
Divine Rights Feudal Monarchist with a Distributist economic model.
TL;DR: Medieval, yo.
>>81
Assuming this is based on study of the actual medieval period and not just reading too many shitty fantasy novels that glorify monarchy and feudalism, I'm curious why you think this is the best system.
wow is really hard to explain but
khaldunian-augustinian-lefebvrian-savonarolism
>>>government
khaldunian tribalism + savonarolian republicanism
>>>economy
sharia-based + savonarolian reforms
>>>moral
early-jansenism + fsspx spiritus™
just a simple non-monarchist catholic traditionalist
as of this week i've become a trollitarian
i support and cast my vote for whichever politicians and whichever model of government will make the most people buttmad
Monarchist
Hate. Hate.
>>82
In political philosophy, I follow Evola, Hans-Dietrich Sander, and, to a lesser degree, DeMaistre. In economy, Chesterton, Belloc, etc.
Evola makes a very good case for the Traditional system from an occult perspective. "As above, so below". But he also makes a good general case for a pyramidal structure in society: Man as the king of his family, the village headman as the king of the village, the local noble as the king of the local land, etc. all the way up to the Emperor, as living God (this aspect can't really be explained in short, so let's just say he is to represent the Sun-God).
Thus, everyone knows where he stands, who he has duties towards, who he leads, who he is bound to obey. But at the same time, everything is local enough to not go crazy - people rarely wish to live next to an abject slave. It also provides a lot of freedom, because feudal governments by definition aren't centralized and thus relatively weak in enforcement.
Sander makes a similar point, mainly adding a more materialistic reason to the supremacy of the Emperor over the Priesthood and showing the good example of the Staufer dynasty.
DeMaistre makes the negative argument - why Republicanism and democracy is bad - inevitably resulting in tyranny of the masses voting themselves more benefits, with no regard to general welfare, inevitable orgies of bloodshed akin to the French revolution, etc.
The economic thinkers I mentioned argue for Distributism - "Three Acres and a Cow". Small-scale agriculture as the center of the economy for a sensible outlook - there is no other industry without agriculture, and added stability. Craftsmen to be organized in local guild structures, ordered by profession, not managerial/worker status, ensuring everyone can make an independent living as long as he tries, but the living varies based on his skill.
There really is no way to make the argument to overthrow nearly the last thousand years of history without sounding like a lunatic. The best I can say, consider the modern world, and the kind of life it leads to, and if you're happy with it. And if modernity is wrong, then might it not be wrong at the core, rather than some minor misstep that may have happened everywhere modernity took hold?
If you're interested, I recommend you read as much of their works as you're able to (I don't think Sanders got much English translation). The Economic thinkers are a lot more fun to read, so maybe start there..
NIGGERS
>>91
give me everything you have about this hummcuscuz sander
ich beherrsche die deutsche sprache gut genug um deutsch-brasilianer an meinem lusitanischen penis riechen zu lassen
Avery Morrow is a disqusting homosexual neofacist pedophile who needs to die. We must find Avery Morrow and brutally murder him. Avery Morrow's long flacid penis curves around into his anus and through his mouth into 0037s butt. He violently thrusts the flacid object through his mouth and into the ass of 0037. 0037 moans with joy. Avery Morrow has 10000 orgasms with force, filling 0037's colon with 2000 gallons of semen and dried smegma.The force of the orgasms makes Avery Morrow's penis turn erect, fracturing due to it's impossible curves. The force of his exploding penis blasts him backwards 10000000000km into the past. Suddenly 1000000000000000000000 shotas fall from the sky and he can't resists and fill them with cum and is assraped 10000 times in prison. His anus prolapses forever and he is always leaking shit. He was a basqu3 niggir the whole time the end.Make zoomers as miserable as possible, forever. That's it.
The government already does that pretty well.
we live in a society