If Descartes feels tanasinn does he cease to exist?
If a Panda is completely alone in the forest and is pushing a bamboo with one paw and clapping with only the other, empty paw, while the bamboo hits the ground, does it make a sound?
In actuality, what Descartes said was closer to "The only thing I cannot doubt is my own doubt.". This should be tanasinn-compatiæˆæˆæˆæˆæˆ
Also he then went of from there on a mad tangent and ended up at "Therefore, God exists!".
Descartes was more of a thinker than a feæˆæ, ˆæˆæˆæˆæ and ˆæˆæˆæˆæˆ
But you have to æˆæˆæˆ guy some credit with that tanæˆæˆ. That really is more fæˆæˆ than thæˆæˆæˆæˆæˆ
Well, but if æˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆTanasinnˆæˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆˆæˆæˆæˆæˆ
Really? I always thought Descartes wˆæˆæˆæˆæˆoppai oppai.
God says "I refuse to prove I exist, for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."
Man then says "But the Babel Fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It proves you exist, and therefore you don't"
God says "oh dear, I didn't think of that" and disappears in a puff of logic.
Man says "that was easy" and proceeds to prove that black is white and white is black and gets killed at the next zebra crossing.
Cogito, ergo 戈æˆæˆæˆæˆTanasinnˆæˆæˆæˆ
Our imperfect world is only a mirror of absolute ˆæˆtanasinn戈æˆ
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@t
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@n@@@@@@@@@@@@@a
@@ @ @ @@@@@@ @ @QQQQQQQQ
@@ @ @ @@@@@@ @@ @ QQQQQQ^@ ^
@@@@@@@@@@@@n@@@_@ _@› ^@ ^@@@n
@@@@@@@@@ @@@@@@@ ._@ _^@ ^
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ @ ._@ _^
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@i@@@@@ ._@@@@@@a
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@s
„ª„±„ª@ „¬„ª„@ „¬„„«@ „¬„ª„@ „¬„ª„ª@ „±@ „¬„„«„¬„„«
@ „«@ @ „´„ª„´@ „«„«„«@ „´„ª„´@ „¯„ª„@ „«@ „«„«„«„«„«„«
@ „«@ „¯„®@ „¯„®„«„¯„®„¯„®@ „¯„®„ª„ª„®@ „³@ „«„¯„®„«„¯„®
@@@@ ‚ ‚Ž@¿@@@@@@^æˆæˆ_@@@@@@¿@‚Ž ‚
@@@¼“ñÜQ__j@@@@@/æˆæˆæˆ_@@@@iQ__Ü“ñ½
@@@@@@_æˆ_@@@/æF(¥)ˆˆ.(¥)æ |@@@^ˆæ^
@@@@ @@@_æˆ_@ |æˆ^ ›_æˆ|@ ^ˆæ^
@@@@@@@@@_æˆ_|æ /ŽO@|@ŽORæ|^ˆæ^
@@@@ @@@@@@_æˆ|æ.|@Q_|Q_@ |æ|ˆæ^
@@@@@@@@@@@@_æ_ |@@===@@ |^æ^
@@@@ @@@@@@@@@_æ _QQQ^æ^
welcome to desert of tanasinn