[DQN]Who is >>71?[CELEBRITY] (6)

1 Name: Lord Pentium!PG1mP76kIY : 1993-09-5635 03:21

Hello there, one and all! Recently there's been quite a number of threads relating to >>71-sama, for whom I am a spokesperson and of whom I could be considered a friend, appearing on the front page of this board. In this thread we will examine a number of these threads, and determine how accurate each of them is.

1. >>71 is an ugly aggravating unintelligent dirtball
First of all, I must say this is probably the nastiest thread out there about >>71-sama. I would not have dealt with this thread had >>71-sama not asked me to discuss the bad posts as well as the good. That being said, it contains only a very few posts of any truthful content: one being by >>71-sama himself, in an admission that as an irresponsible teenager he used to release the Emergency Mittens in non-emergency situations (which he stopped doing as soon as his father, the great >>142-sama, found out and reprimanded him), another by my twin brother (also named Lord Pentium, a name given to both of us by >>71-sama) reassuring one >>229-san that >>71-sama's mittens were both genuine and of the highest quality, and a few posts by kindhearted citizens of DQN and friends of >>71-sama that were meant to encourage him (such as one by a certain >>14-san, who posted some very kind words about >>71-sama, comparing him to that most gentle and elegant of Asian creatures, the panda). Other than that, this thread is full of lies, mostly propagated by liars who wish to see the reputation of >>71-sama tarnished.

2. >>71 told me he hates mittens
The first thread was overall more insulting to >>71-sama, but this thread contained the single biggest lie I've ever hear anyone tell: that >>71-sama could conceivably NOT like mittens. This lie was so horrible that I myself had to step in to set the record straight. To reiterate: >>71-sama shares the same passionate love for mittens as any other dokyun.

3. >>71 is a GOD AMONG MEN
This thread is, for the most part, as positive about >>71-sama as I could wish, even though it is a bit exaggeratory. Men have often confused great men with gods and prophets (such as in the case of Muhammad, where an honest reformer was and is treated as the chief of all prophets by a major religion), and indeed in some ways the difference is so slight that it barely matters in human experience, but while >>71-sama does have the ability to walk on water (an ability that he hides in all but the most extreme circumstances), I have never, in all my years of close connection with him, seen him calm a stormy sea.

[more in the next post]

2 Name: Lord Pentium!PG1mP76kIY : 1993-09-5635 03:21

4. <a href=http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1192757273> ITT >>71 is a handsome, amiable, intelligent person.</a>
About as much truth as you can get in 70 posts, followed by lies (>>71 did not look like the >>71-sama I know, by any means), followed my truth about >>94-san, the younger, and slightly less famous, brother of >>71-sama, followed by lies about him as well, followed by lies about >>137-san who later proved himself to be the great >>142-sama... you get the picture.

5. <a href=http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1231438757> >>71 is a scheming evil mastermind</a>
Right off the bat, >>71-sama is not evil. Certainly he has his plans and schemes (as all geniuses do), but most of them are either benign (curing AIDS, which according to certain people may have already happened) or at the worst slighly mischevious (rigging the Pennsylvania Lottery to net himself a quick few millions). He would never plot a world takeover or anything of that caliber, as this thread accuses him of doing (the specific evil plan is not mentioned by name, but it's evidently evil enough to warrant a thread). However this thread is spot-on as far as his ability.

I hope that this thread has been helpful in allowing you to determine just what kind of man >>71-sama is. If it has not been helpful, I will take all blame, because while >>71-sama sanctioned this thread, he is not responsible for its contents.

3 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5636 01:48

2get damn...

4 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5636 14:51

>>3
Sorry you missed it, but I know I'd sure like to 4get this thread.

5 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5638 01:51

>>4
You may not like it, but I give it a >>5 out of 5.

6 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-5638 05:33

Thank you. You should write wikipedia articles

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: