>>10
The scum that shit up occult discussions by whining that other people would dare to discuss something without "scientific evidence" are clearly adherents of a specific dogma.
>>10
That article makes a good point (that the term is vague) but I just wanted to complain.
ttp://www.sleepwithmepodcast.com/
ttp://publicdomainreview.org/2018/04/04/fallen-angels-birds-of-paradise-in-early-modern-europe/
When nobody has seen the reference but draws it anyway.
>>43
I have a million ideas for projects I want to work on, and one of them is something that would convert flash loops (but not games) to HTML5 -- a GIF or VP8/WEBM and possibly audio, like vorbis or FLAC or something. I know a lot about other container formats, but not much about Adobe Flash. I wonder how difficult it would be to extract different files from a SWF file and then just use HTML5 for a video or GIF and audio too, kind of like YTMND.
It would be way too hard to convert games or interactive stuff, but just plain loops like you used to see on /f/ boards (sovietrussia or otherwise) are just short videos or images with some audio, and it sucks how you can't see stuff like that on mobile devices. I don't know about you, but I use my iPhone more than my computer nowadays -- simply because you can't fit a computer in your pocket.
>>44 Sounds cool, I only use my computer because I don't have any pockets because I don't have any trousers.
ttps://www.youtube.com/user/yovo68/videos
people think they're hot shit, that clearance sign is for other people, no it's for them
>>48
Howdy I'm known as Cool Dad! Please pay me the appropriate sum and I'll give you a membership to my Secre Tarea for Very Important People.
http://i.4cdn.org/f/num1000remix.swf
get it while it's hot
or get it the next time someone reposts
>>52 it's just the one 45 year old alcoholic redskin posting sooks all day