ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger#/media/File:Badger_species_map.png
the time America almost nuked itself by accident
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1961_Goldsboro_B-52_crash
>>846, I honestly don't see why on earth a person with a minority complaint should be expected to "just drop it".
Or do I just not understand how Wikipedia works and what that article meant?
Yes, I noticed:
> This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
>>868 I'm so happy you posted this, you made my day ( ߁)/
>>869
check out the other places in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Closed_cities, most of them have pretty cool flags (probably because many didn't exist before soviet times and so the flag wasn't invented by some medieval noble who thought slapping a hawk or a stag onto some solid color was the epitome of graphic design)
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marianne
(the slightly disrobed, slightly moe symbol of France)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoko_Date
Huh, I wonder why this didn't take o--(opens up pic)JESUS CHRIST
>Although many commentators have highlighted the lighter side of the concern, squirrels have proven consistently able to cripple power grids in the U.S. and other countries.[1][2] While some commentators emphasize the humorous aspect, they still imply that the danger posed to the electrical grid from squirrels is ongoing and concerning.[3][4]
It wouldnft be WIKIPEDIA QUALITY without the same sentence repeated two or three times in a row with several citations each time.