>>11
>>8 here. You have delineated some technical considerations quite clearly, but I will not stand here and take that. I answered the question on the emotional level it was asked.

Re-read my statement very carefully, but this time with the understanding that it is a rather high praise of making systems that aren't broken and are hard to break. Never so often does man's hand truly touch things in a manner that it might be mistaken for a work of God, yet here we are.