https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textboard
there was a brief edit war before an admin said no
fuck wikipedia
but wikipedia is the source of all my knowledge:( no joke
I'm sure you could find some article or outline of textboards that mentions 4-ch to prove the site's 'relevancy'. Wikipedia is a handpicked collection of references first and an encyclopedia second, after all.
Obvious jews are behind this
Kuz is obviously doing this so that his textboards will be the top link on Wikipedia in a few years. Fucking kuz!
We got caught.... it's all over.... say goodbye to 4-ch....
> eqmemvtti2
lol.
no one fucking likes you "401", do you actually need to see more posts saying as such to make you give up your game?
>>13
Shut up. Stop blaming every bad that befalls you on magical internet boogeymen
did 4-ch ask to be advertised on Wikipedia?
No, we did not.
The expired saovq reference last retrieved a decade ago being left untouched is the funniest thing in all of this.
Self promotion on wikipedia: Act 2! Sponsored by: Antifa Pedophiles
CUT!!!!!!!
All these decades of 4-ch having no problem being on wikipedia and of course some shady russian had to make a big deal out of it. Fucking hell.
So why was it removed? Because 2chan's textboards are more popular or something? Was it removed due to being somehow tangentially related to some Russian guy (who Wikipedians also probably think "tampered with" elections in the United States LOL).
Also, I saw a new thing/user interface change at a popular website in Tue Oct 26 19:18:43 2021 UTC. Hint: end of video, center.
Captcha: hate
>>19
i warned you to ignore this retard
>>23
you cant tell me what to do!!
>me not being able to advertise my shitty site on wikipedia is LITERALLY harassment
Wikipedia: the encyclopedia where manufactured controversy matters more than actual knowledge.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amaim_Warrior_at_the_Borderline#Controversy
>>26 ranting about shit and then calling it manufactured controversy kinda undermines your point. but in all likelihood, if it really isn't relevant, then the original author of the article or whoever added that in probably just didn't do enough research. go fix it if it bothers you
It was removed again because of "muh advertising"...
Consider bringing up in the talk pages that its one of the oldest kareha textboards out there, is well known among textboard users, and that it was mistakenly removed because of actual not noteworthy textboards trying to advertise themselves.
good
Is there any reliable encyclopedia website to recommend, preferably a static website or a web1.0 website, I don’t like websites with too bloated scripts
Came here from the wikipedia talk page itself. lol.
>>34
I googled Encarta and was sent to https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/education which features an "AI-powered assistant". It's all over.
Also if there was really a web-based version of Encarta I bet it didn't have that cool maze game.