>suckless
No thank you!
i dont trust them
>>4
Just read the source code, bitch.
It's the most readable shit out there. Simple and to the point.
let's get to 1000 by shitty reimplementations of basic unix tools!
>>6
All other implementations are bad. Something everyone messed up, for example, is UTF-8. This video @11:08 explains why have suckless unix tools: http://dl.sta.li/slcon/2015/slcon-2015-01-frign-suckless_core.webm
Why do these tools have true and false?
No new interfaces but they still bother with this obsolete shit.
>>8
I'm pretty sure Plan 9 didn't mess up UTF-8...
>>11
Yeah, .webm isn't suckless enough. .ogg only, please!
>>9
What's obsolete about Boolean logic?
>(exit) and (exit 1) do the exact same thing in any modern shell.
not for long
>>16
you really think everyone is going to go back to using the thompson shell, almost 40 years after it became obsolete?
suckless has some bad political/economic perspectives in their /sucks/ area, so it makes their philosophy, and thus, their software suspect, by association
>>18
Can you give some examples? All I'm seeing that might be considered "political" is the view that C++ is bad.
suckless sucks