ITT we talk about words that aren't in the dictionary but should be! (18)

1 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-22 21:46 ID:a7qV/+qW

For me, it's "assumptuous," as in, someone who assumes things a lot is an "assumptuous" person.

2 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-23 23:48 ID:LjCIo7+G

wouldn't that be an assuming person?

3 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-24 09:27 ID:pS25TOBX

>>2
Having an assumptious personality, maybe? Dunno what OP is getting at

4 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-24 11:08 ID:Heaven

paizuri

5 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-24 14:15 ID:ccXlcL1j

>>4 Hey!, good point!

6 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-24 22:21 ID:Heaven

Assumptuous is a word, at least as much as presumptuous is.

7 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-04-28 02:26 ID:Heaven

calmth.
calm sucks, so in analogy to warmth: calmth.

8 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-05-05 11:43 ID:ApGTqf6h

As a native speaker of a germanic language, I want "overmorrow" and "hight". Both are archaic words and might actually be in the dictionary if it's a good enough dictionary.

"Overmorrow" means "the day after tomorrow". Much less of a mouthful.

"Hight" means "to be named". There are a bunch of sentences that become awkward in English because there's no transitive verb to form sentences like "I hight Squeeks". Instead you are forced to use clumsy constructions like "My name is Squeeks"

9 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-05-06 12:23 ID:Tw1OnwBe

>>8
So "hight" is like the verb "heta" (=to be called, or named) in Swedish? Or heissen in German?

About "overmorrow", it's like the Finnish word ylihuominen: yli means over and morrow, well, could mean huominen.

10 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-05-12 22:32 ID:0axXbK6A

Liff

11 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-05-13 10:53 ID:Heaven

   人     
  (__)    
  (__)   
 ( __ )    
 ( ・∀・) < I am named Squeeks and don't see the point of hight.
 (つ   つ   
 | | |     
 (__)_)

12 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-05-14 01:34 ID:3RcU5iB6

>>9
I would like to point out that "overmorrow" also exists in Swedish. "Överimorgon". I will assume overmorrow exists in the other scandinavian languages as well, as it would be pretty odd if it didn't.

13 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2006-05-16 21:44 ID:6ulX6Ksl

English needs an equivalent of the Swedish dygn. It's the word for 24 hours. Knowing the amount of words English has, it's pretty weird that this meaning is also inside the word day. Could be because of the AM/PM stuff I guess.

14 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2008-10-21 12:40 ID:Vbpy8G4Z

isnt "to be named" sort of what "am" is used for, "I AM Squeek" / "I HIGHT Squeek"????????????????????????????????

15 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2008-10-21 12:42 ID:Vbpy8G4Z

i think the word "parropen" should be in the dictionary, as a cross between a parrot and can opener, for convenience when sayin the commonly used phrase "that parrot opened my can", this can be replaced with "my can has been parropened"...thoughts anyone?

16 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2009-08-27 17:12 ID:9hWde2MA

hmm good point such an addition as 'parropen' could EASILY avoid common asshattery (also a word) in every pirates day to day routine!

17 Name: Stefan : 2012-03-08 02:56 ID:eGVWFfbC

Overmorgen exists in the dutch language, as in Overmorrow.
I agree that it feels and sounds very good.

18 Name: Anonymous Linguist : 2014-12-03 22:54 ID:pRfKvoBL

>>9
Yes, both of those words come from the same proto-germanic root.

In Old English, the verb was "hatan." It was typically used intransitively, and as such, it was one of the few verbs that retained a genuine passive-voice that wasn't formed by a helping verb, as in Modern English. So, to say "my name is", all one had to say was "ic hate" (I am called.) But another way one frequently encounters is by using the indefinite pronoun "man" (one), so for instance, "man mec hætt" (one calls me)

Hight was used at least until the 1600s. One poem was written on the death of the composer Thomas Tallis. It contains the line:

His name to shew, was THOMAS TALLYS hyght.

In this example, we see that hight was used passively.

Anyway, I doubt it would ever catch on. One of the biggest reasons, besides it being archaic, is that it is a homophone with height.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: