>>349
He's Gilbert Gottfried. Squinting and screaming is his stage persona. He's sort of well known in the US.
As I suppose I should also post a video link, here's something that contains little or no Gilbert Gottfried: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Cx68oSy2o
This video contains content from WMG and Time S.p.A., one or more of whom have blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.
>I love to wiggle the whole thing.
Well, that's one thing we can agree on.
http://eye.swfchan.com/flash.asp?id=999&n=Assassin.swf&w=400&h=300
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEcur0k8EwQ
Look what I just _exume_d.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJSkm5Whr14
RETURN OF EXTREME PARKING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcXqyfPxNgE
01'07": Terminal addiction symptoms.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEOTWk8VZAQ
You might recognize this singer-songwriter from the 2007 Tokyo Governor election. In retrospect, he couldn't have been all that much worse at the job than Ishihara.
>>373
Nico Nico Douga loved this guy, almost as much as Angry German Kid. But he'll never be an as beloved icon as Billy Herrington.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc7F-ofoCEU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueqvgg6SkMI (work warning: contains prosthetic boob)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_trHR0PDP4 hey, it's the train I rode to school every morning!
>>393
2IOuUBm4_Fw is more quality than you might ever hope to achieve. Anyway, you aren't contributing, so you might as well jump through a glass (pretending that you believe you can fly, and videotape it).
The Hypocritical Circlejerk of DQN
>>395
fyi, i contribute without tripping. at this point i don't even remember how much i contributed, but it has to be something like 8% of the thread so far.
i don't think you understand what quality videos are at this point. please contribute anonymously so you won't be a repeat offender.
All right, enough of your fucking bitching everyone.
Here is a quality video for your entertainment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cepCz6EMVwo
>>398
If you weren't contributing anonymously, it could be easily proven that you don't have a slightest idea about quality. Also, who are you to determine what is quality? You are a part of a herd. And what was my offence? I refuse to mix with the herd.
Let me tell you, being in a herd is against the concept of elitism, and it can't be considered as ironic. It's degrading.
Back in the day DQN was a community of independent posters who shared their wit. But nowadays it can only be perceived as a museless herd. And the fact that I'm in disgrace is a proof.
FYI, these questions are rhetoric. I'm not open for a further discussion on this topic.
>>396
Precisely. (Punch Ctrl+W to complain!)
Here's your video of the day: http://youtu.be/v22FLMaReyk
>posters who shared their wit
but you don't have any wit to share...
shit video as well, i love everything by cboyardee and mlp but that was shit, didn't have any of what made the original so good
>>401
FYI, you are a disgrace, an individualist, and kind of a dick. These are not negotiable points.
And anything anyone says to get a point across is rhetoric, dumbass.
>>405
You didn't get it, did you? I mocked your perceived intellectual ability. I'm going to call you a cock next time. It should be easier for you to understand.
>>406
Oh, I got it. I don't care. You don't know who I am; that's by design. But what you said was that you're not open for a further discussion. You discussed further. You, sir, are a lying jerk.
>>408,409
When I work my way into the government, I'll make sure that you, kids, are kept at schools during summer.
Have some oldskool spirit: https://www.youtube.com/v/dHyYLZTdfPE
>>416
Perhaps the same could be said of all YouTube videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L26b2OTM9eo
>>418, please don't derail the quality by missing your intended thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ctv_i4Anfc
I like how some of the people are obviously shocked and disgusted but are trying to cover it up on the chat, forgetting they're in front of a webcam...
i@L‿TMj Brevity is the something of wit. Can I have some brevity?