Who are you people? (40)

1 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 20:23

Tell us something about yourself.

2 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 20:25

I work just barely enough to cover my bills, and then just kind of lie around the rest of the time.

3 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 20:32

I'm a nice guy with a cute wife. I have a degree but I don't have a job. We share a flat with a guy who I try to get along with but he's a bit of a douchebag with no manners and no respect. I have been coming to this board for almost 6 years now I think. My captcha is chageing.

4 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 20:34

>>3
Why don't you get rid of the punk?

5 Name: winter : 1993-09-7132 20:47

I consider >>1 to be my friend, and I enjoy being part of a friendly community.

6 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 20:57

I don't like cubes

7 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 21:02

>>5
I'm new to this board and hope to take part in its... slow... thorough community!

8 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 21:34

>>1
I like mittens and organic chemistry. I am in love with a fictional character.

9 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 22:07

>>8
"mittens" is a common theme around here...

A waifu?

10 Name: Darkpiss : 1993-09-7132 22:12

>>7
Welcome!

Now, what do we do with the remainder of this thread?

11 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 22:13

>>9
Yes, and yes.

Odd to think there's another of us now. That makes seven, I think?

12 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 22:13

>>10
Allow me to get to know the community and understand it(?)

13 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 22:14

>>11
I like a closed community.

14 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 22:18

I did that by lurking, >>12, but whatever floats your boat I guess! Although you'll never get a good enough feel for a community just by having someone explain it for you.

15 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 22:20

>>14
I have lurked here multiple times before, but had yet to create a thread. I stumbled upon this place for about the fifth time and decided today was the day.

16 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 22:44

I'm a high school dropout with no special talents. I try to study my interests, but I waste all of my time with video games and online distractions such as this.

>>2 is the person I could be if I were a little more motivated.

17 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7132 22:46

>>15
I do agree with >>14 that lurking is the best, but I suggest leaving the name field blank when you post, which will set your name to the default. It's ultimately your choice, but it's the preferred method, I think.

18 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 22:48

>>16
I can relate with you a lot... ._.

>>17
I usually prefer anonymity as well; I'll post anonymously outside of this thread.

19 Name: Darkpiss : 1993-09-7132 23:05

There are a couple of people here who post using a name. I decided I'd try it out not long ago.
I usually post anonymously though; the decision not to is arbitrary.

Anyway, also, I don't know which/how many other anonymous boards you've used, but in case you didn't know, unlike some places, mailto:sage isn't hostility or condemnation here; it's more a humble gmy post needn't bump to the top of the pageh.
It's a relatively small point but I feel it's an important distinction to make, and one that makes places like this feel nice and friendly.

20 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7132 23:30

>>19
I'm very familiar with anonymous boards and the overall collective culture. I guess each community has its own etiquette.

21 Name: grey!C.MxxuCiTo : 1993-09-7133 01:23

I'm a college student who only makes 40 USD every two weeks through my work-study. My only talent is a nack for accents. I should be doing my homework right now.

22 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 02:57

>>19
I know which some place you're referring to. Most of the boards understand how sage works, especially the Japanese ones. It's the huge western boards that take it as an insult.

23 Name: Minister of Immigration : 1993-09-7133 03:12

This thread is not DQN quality, you should not make threads and instead just follow in suit as others do instead of expecting an entire community to change to fit you.

As to the argument about Sahgay, it's used to say this thread isn't one that really deserves to be on the front page, no wonder there are so many ASCII cement booted salmon on their way down with bad threads.

Requesting permasage.

24 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 03:17

THREAD ERROR: NO META TAGS
Emergency Mittens Deployed
Make [1]: all recursive error 269

25 Name: emile disciple : 1993-09-7133 03:25

We can step twice into a river and we cannot. We are and we are not.

26 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 03:33

You really shouldn't post here until you've read all of tanasinn.

27 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 11:30

>>26 That's kinda cheating I think! Tanasinn.info is great and interesting, but learning by lurking is the vet's way of posting.

28 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 12:13

>>27
Research through the sites creations and chroniclers like tanasinn, and then lurking, and then tenarively posting in others threads is the best method.

29 Name: ( ˂ ƒŽ˃) : 1993-09-7133 12:32

Can we just forget this ever happened? >>1, even though apparently being well-versed in text boards, decided to dedicate a whole thread to himself. The prevailing opinion is that one should lurk in order to learn what to do. I think creating a thread just to get a feel for a place is quite obnoxious, and not very DQN.

Enough with the meta, let's enjoy some other threads!

30 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 14:17

I thought this was quite a nice thread actually.

31 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 16:13

>>29
I'm with >>30. As meta-threads go, this one was very tastefully done, and covers a topic we haven't really discussed before. If you really don't like it then just ignore it.

32 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7133 17:02

Well, I can see that the level of autism is fairly high here.

33 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 17:04

>>31
It's not a meta thread, it doesn't have the proper [Meta] tags, and besides, we have already gone over this topic, [BIO] About Me [INTRODUCTION][HELLO] (13).

34 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 17:08

I dream of a DQN where we only have three threads, but they're all super long.

35 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 18:16

>>32
You seemed an OK guy, but then I realised that you were not. It was around the time you posted >>32.

36 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 19:24

>>34
I dream of a DQN where we bump 6-8 year old threads to the front page on a daily basis since they don't die with age.

37 Name: Stranger : 1993-09-7133 19:26

>>35
Well, it's clear to me that you are guilty of having autism, and I'm not even going to sage. Sorry for you other nice people. This guy ruined it for you.

38 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 19:35

Yes, I forced you to bump your thread with a contentless post. It's all my fault. Blame me, everyone! Not this swell guy. He didn't blame anyone of being gguiltyh of having a mental disorder, that's for sure.

39 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 20:11

This thread is worse than Gnome 3.

40 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7133 20:23

>>38
Are you angry?

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: