[DQN] Name change! (89)

66 Name: (´・ω・) : 1993-09-7520 19:53

>>65 just a dokyun's opinion:

  1. Yes
  2. Veto
  3. Seems a little mutually redundant with 4
  4. Only necessary if it's not visible on the page (ie. more than five posts old on the main page)
  5. Yes! - it's incredibly slow thanks to the awesome power of (what I can only assume to be) the flat text database, it's slow and loading the page can be interrupted entirely if someone else posts in the meantime.

Also, I feel a little as if too much "fluff" on the board will distract from the traditional BBS feel.

I'll take this opportunity to congratulate you for taking care of this board, thank you very much.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: