[Wikipedia] ITT DQN QUALITY Wikipedia Links [Part III] (999)

873 Name: >>867 : 1993-09-10010 11:27

>>872
Fuck you, the superb owl link wasn't a duplicate and the Wikipedia article you compared it to is of a broader subject

874 Name: >>867 : 1993-09-10010 11:29

>>872
Actually, ambush marketing doesn't even have anything slightly to do with trademark avoiding owls so fuck you even harder

875 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10010 14:55

>>873,874 Take a chill pill bro, what's with the hostility? No one said it was a duplicate, just that Superb Owls were brought up here a few weeks ago on that similar article - there's a paragraph on trademark-avoiding owls. Did you post it for that reason, or did you post it because you separately thought it was cpm pt`khsx? Don't fuck lol

876 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10010 21:01

>>875
Yes I thought the dictionary entry about the owls was funnier than the Wikipedia article about a broader subject that barely anybody except you read mentioning owls on the bottom of the page.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.