>>423 I think it's meant to be serious and I find the ideals listed on them repugnant, but it smells more like the naïve arrogance of an individual (or indeed small group) who isn't as well educated as he believes and can't think past stage one, yet believes his conclusions universal.
The apparently aborted time capsule project, poor spelling and grammar, and reference to "an age of reason" (betraying an unawareness that this name is already claimed) is what makes me lean that way.