What is in your mind? Anything you are thinking about.
Me:
I wonder what the future holds for me.
That is it.
You?
Thinking about this sweet 2get
just having a chill day.
HEY HEY NINGEN SUCKER HEY NINGEN FUCKER
>>4
ОНИ ВЫЕБАЛИ КРАСКУ ВЫЕБАЛИ КАСКУ ВЫЕБАЛИ КАСКУ НИНГЕНЬ
I'm currently doing some schoolwork. Differential equations are a bitch.
I'm wondering why heliohost considers ricky a stable server when I always seem to have issues with it
I am becoming increasingly obsessed with the concept of ultimate reality.
At some level, I am worried about a model on the individual level. The only thing I cannot deny is the very experience of the sensory input that I experience at any given moment.
Everything else is a story or a narrative.
I know there is a separation between the real world and the online world, at least for me, meaning that in the real world people are not like they are in the online world. I wonder what to make of all of this. What is even there to do in life. The things I thought I would enjoy do not look that enjoyable anymore.
I come here and write this, I guess I enjoy it at some level, but I wonder why my eyes fixate my gaze on a certain area or object when I am trying to observe what is in front of me. What drives my eyes to do things. Must be the same thing that drives me to come here and type all of this.
Reasons and causes can be many, so much so, I cannot make sense of anything.
I sense that the real world out there, away from the online world is nothing like I imagine, but talking with others seems like a mutual cooperation in illusory making that both parties might or might not enjoy.
Is authenticity even a thing, I wonder. Things weren't always like this.
>>8
The "real" world is also false. See demiurge, maya, etc.
彡⌒ミ
(´･ω･｀) ｎ__
η ＞ ⌒＼/ ､_∃
(∃)/ ∧ ＼_/
＼_/ ＼ 丶
＿人人人人人人人人人＿
＞>>9 is wrong!＜
￣Y^Y^Y^Y^Y^Y^Y^￣
That's an outdated platonic idea. Learn to embrace the material world.
thinking about your mom
>>10
I'd hardly call it outdated when people bandy around talk of "we're living in a simulation" which is ultimately the same idea just couched in technological/sci-fi terms rather than mystical/spiritual ones.
I'm wondering why this board is so fast recently
>>8
The real world is an illusion. Nothing is solid, the universe is a series frames of a 4D space-time snapshot moving along one planck frame - reality is a projection of slides. You make of your reality as you choose, don't let the universe define your reality on your behalf.
O is for Omniverse, by Rob Bryanton and Marilyn E Robertson https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL58EFA9B4188801C6
>>15
how can you be so sure that the universe is only defined by 4 dimensions? What if there are more? Yours is just a theory based on what might be false.
>>15
I can imagine a complete totality of all possible universal combinations being derived from a 10th spatial dimension. The reason why I wrote "4D space-time snapshot" is because people don't understand the meaning of "5D space-time-probability snapshot"; our reality is derived from the fifth spatial dimension and that the past, present, and future are an "illusion" within the fifth spatial dimension. This illusion is the consequence of decoherence in the reality of quantum waves that form the illusion of space-time that we readily observe "right now".