If you spot something that needs moderator attention, post about it here.

Specify the exact thread and post number(s) if possible.

http://4-ch.net/ascii/kareha.pl/1557925636/l50

http://4-ch.net/music/kareha.pl/1375568426/12

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1558980402/l50
Should be in /tech/, not /general/.

http://4-ch.net/sports/kareha.pl/1556826375/3
http://4-ch.net/sports/kareha.pl/1531344946/3

This is old, but shouldn't be on the sports board:
http://4-ch.net/sports/kareha.pl/1491874437/l50

http://4-ch.net/music/kareha.pl/1375568426/13

also http://4-ch.net/sports/kareha.pl/1556826375/4

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1503888459/968

http://4-ch.net/debate/kareha.pl/1561538078/
http://4-ch.net/debate/kareha.pl/1561536094/

http://4-ch.net/games/kareha.pl/1156356541/18

http://4-ch.net/net/kareha.pl/1518285064/7

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1405122098/193

http://4-ch.net/food/kareha.pl/1221078654/4

http://4-ch.net/ascii/kareha.pl/1122749682/95

http://4-ch.net/games/kareha.pl/1105242533/90

The "8ch died" thread in General should be moved to either Net Culture or IAA.

>>656
Or just deleted because it's on track to fill up with more neonazi bullshit.

>>657
Even if that does happen, 8ch dying is an important enough topic that it deserves a thread dedicated to its death. Moderators can just delete any especially shitty posts or permasage it if it devolves into political shitflinging.

http://4-ch.net/debate/kareha.pl/1503877098/5

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1565249067/3

also http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1565581441/11

>>660
That thread was probably made by spam bots, look at >>1. The wonder woman spammers are pretty funny, I've seen them on other textboards too. I suppose it's a step up from the usual single post bot spam.

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1523704499/l50
This new spammer is pretty weird.

vc: chise

>>663
Actually, now that I look at it, that thread possibly isn't spam. Damn DQN, you never know if it's spam or a real (shitty) thread. It looks like something that wonder woman spammer would post.

>>4 in that thread is definitely spam though.

http://4-ch.net/debate/kareha.pl/1567498400/

>>641-643,645-652,654-655 Done, and thanks for your reports.
>>660,663-665 Those are all from the same range (as well as some of the posts above) and probably just one person/bot, considering the fairly consistent posting style. Requesting a rangeban on it, which I suppose I should have done a while ago.

>>666
Thank you for your good work!

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1569377597/l50

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1550736464/423

this is probably spam? idk, it's kind of on topic for the thread

>>666
thx mr. satan

how convenient

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1503888459/979,981

http://4-ch.net/iaa/kareha.pl/1576646720/

http://4-ch.net/anime/kareha.pl/1574981814/2,5

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1578131508/
http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1226008769/718

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1578131200/

>>672,676 Deleted.
>>668,673,675 Permasaged, don't seem worth deleting; same for >>674
>>669 Seems to be the case; didn't delete it in time and now it has some replies. If I can find a way, I'll remove only the link.

Happy new year.

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1576997201/

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1578266099/
Also >>678 (´・ω・`)

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1503888459/994
http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1106996078/490
http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1525233597/5-7

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1579347184/
http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1579409640/

I don't know if this is subject to deletion, but I'm not a fan of new, prone-to-die imageboards being spammed on other websites.
http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1579029031/

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1579862069

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1579995395/l50

http://4-ch.net/tech/kareha.pl/1579777606/

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1106996078/492

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1557771198/4

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1557299761/225

this could, theoretically, be output from talktotransformer but I'm pretty sure it's spam

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1583445163/

http://4-ch.net/iaa/subback.html

coomers as far as the eyes can see

The 4chan virus seems to be spreading and bringing its lingo together with it.
http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1585368102/
http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1583445163/

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1585622171/

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1585620025/l50

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1555688921/

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1555688921/

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1585908054/

>>698
If I may offer my opinion: bad threads are not spam.

I admit the difference is subtle, but try to identify the distinction between an unfunny opening post that clearly attempts to participate in the time-honored "AA character" trend in DQN, and other posts commonly reported in this thread, such as (most recently): link to cartoon porn and other random websites, and over 10 threads consisting solely of the subject line and text "COO​MER".

Speaking of coo​mers: http://4-ch.net/general/subback.html

http://4-ch.net/food/subback.html

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1586462759/ pretty good question, imo

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1586498124/ It's our old free college buddy again (probably)

http://4-ch.net/iaa/kareha.pl/1586539317/

Not a cleanup request, but I don't know where I'm supposed to post this.
This thread http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1247184946/ has had quite a few replies since 242, but when I open it I can only see up to 242. I don't know if it's just me or the thread is simply glitched.

>>707
Clearing the cache worked. Thanks!

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1587491382/

http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1377507021/449
Seems like weird spam.

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1585003407/12

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1588709268/
http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1589744574/
http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1589788373/

Gotta admit I replied to some of these threads but a new one every day is gonna get old fast. If nothing else they belong on /politics/

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1591324279/

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1591489376/
http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1591497350/

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1591507175

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1591525081

Thank you whichever mod cleaned up /general/. It may be DQN Lite even at the best of times but that's better than being 4chan /pol/ lite.

>>679-682,684,686-697,700-705,710-716
Deleted and/or permasaged.

>>699
Seconded, this applies to >>683,685,709 as well. I guess I've made an exception for the stuff in /general/; I've left some of the threads permasaged for now, please let me know if I should un-permasage any of them (or any other threads for that matter).

>>716
You're welcome.

http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1525233597/8

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1594362747/

http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1594718056/

http://4-ch.net/personal/kareha.pl/1167712995/19

>>719-724
Done!

Can someone ban that one kid who is spamming emojis on here.

>>726
🖕

I don't care that he's spamming emojis but I do care that he just bumped the oldest thread on every board with one.

>>729
It ruins the quality.

>>726
>>728
Same fag.
Also cry moar.

>>731
Get the fuck out you're too young to be here.

>>732
Imagine gatekeeping with age a website.

>>731>>733
Why are you defending an emoji spammer?
That guy should change his ways right away or get banned for bumping threads for no apparent reason.

>>734
This.

>>733

Uggh not the imagine meme again i hate when kids use this meme because it shows a attitude of smugness and not giving a fuck about lurking and learning about internet culture because they think 4chan is 4chan everywhere you go and that they belong everywhere newsflash kids you don't lurk more and read up on the history of text boards before posting.

Please ban >>734 and >>736 for stinking up the place with their diaper-shitting baby whining, thank you!

>>737

You're the one causing trouble here GTFO.

>>734
I'm not defending anyone. I too think he/she should be banned.
I was referring to the part of being too young to be here. I don't understand why someone should be banned for being too young if he isn't causing trouble(not referring to the emoji spammer, I'm talking in general now). It's an attitude I saw other times in this site.

>>736
I've lurked enough and been on this site for enough time.
I don't even use 4chan. Maybe you should expand your horizons a bit instead of putting everyone in the same pot.

>>726-739
I'm just going to hand out a warning and clean it up, and leave it at that. No need to make a big deal out of this.

>>739

Because you're too young to remember the old internet and your generation ruins everything it touches.