Since 4chan's /prog/ has become little more than meme spamming, I decided I'd try here.
Me and a group of anons are working on a POSIX-compliant OS, which will be developed anonymously and be public domain. Currently we've started on replacing GNU's Coreutils with Anoncoreutils, and have around 1/3 of the utilities finished. This is both an experiment in anonymous software development and an attempt to eliminate the bloat that GNU's programs tend to have.
Anyone is welcome to join in with this, as long as they don't leave a name and don't mind writing code for the public domain.
More info at http://rechan.eu.org/ac/ and http://rechan.eu.org/ax/
>>99
No it wasn't, the whole site was broken before you moved.
http://wakaba.c3.cx/soc/kareha.pl/1108009355/n180-
Hmm... I was looking through the BSD source tree and wondering why BSD doesn't have their own compiler? They seem to use gcc too.
>>102
Apparently 4.4BSD, the final release of the original which the current distributions of BSD are descended from, switched from a truly ancient compiler (1970s vintage) called "pcc" to gcc. I'm not certain why; pcc might have been AT&T owned at the time, or just suffering from neglect.
A maintainer appeared last year and started working on pcc again, and there's talk that the more ideological BSDs (i.e. not FreeBSD) might switch back to using it.
commissioned by /prog/:
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils-20080601-1.tar.bz2
>>102,105
i lol'd at !6mHaRuhies, !MhMRSATORI!!L0f5nl0+ and above having the same ID
>>107
We're posting through the local repo server. It's so you can identify what posts are from the Anonix core group (which manages file releases among other things) to prevent someone else from faking a release filled with GNU copypasta.
>>108
What, being a tripfag isn't adequate proof of your identity?
Also, you should mention somewhere your shit isn't BSD 4.3 compatible and requiring _XOPEN_SOURCE=600 or similar to compile without spewing undefined identifiers, at least on my system.
Also, ISO C90 still doesn't support 'long long'.
>>109
a/c isn't Windows compatible either now is it?
Try compiling on a fully POSIX compliant system.
Compile the few progs that use 'long long' in C99 mode if you must.
> Try compiling on a fully POSIX compliant system.
I'm running Ubuntu on an OLPC. Care to suggest what I can install on an OLPC that's fully POSIX compliant, since that apparently isn't?
>>111
MINIX ought to work, but I'm using LFS with the include files edited to naturally define the POSIX stuff (instead of having it locked inside #ifdef's).
(Not too familiar with OLPC, but I think it's a standard PC architecture which should be fine.)
rechan is down halp
>>113
works now, probably just server maintenence
int haxanus (void) {
printf("file not found, DESU\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
Eliminating the bloat that GNU utilities have? Command line programs?
You people are tripping.
lol permasaged
RAGE FAGGOTS, RAGE!
Also, Boxxy.
Also THE GAME!
HAX MY ANUS!
>122
i see you, but that doesn't count in a permasaged thread anyway
posting in a legendary kusosure