[META] Nomic game Meta discussion [RULES] (27)

1 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 16:32

Just thought people may need a place to discuss nomic without disrupting the flow of the thread.

2 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 17:43

I think we should use tripcodes in the thread so no voting fraud goes on. Any trip that hasn't been in the first 25 posts must post 3 non consecutive times in order to gain the right to vote on rules.

3 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 18:12

>>2
If you think that should be so, add it as a rule.

4 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 18:18

>>3
I want some opinions beforehand

5 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 19:28

Wow that looks hard!

6 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 19:56

I think the voting part of the game is kind of pointless on an anonymous medium. Rules should just be added when they're suggested, removed when a post suggest they be removed etc.

Plus, I think it makes things less complicated.

7 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 21:33

I forgot a line break in post >>10. I also forgot to include that the rule is to be disregarded along with the punishment. Oh well.

8 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 23:23

Yay, I'm hyperventilating due to learning something new! This is so exciting! I'm going to play separate Nomic games with all my IM friends‼

>>2
Tripcodes won't help anyway. fusianasan#<tripcode> might, but cheats would just use proxies.

>>7
You also made two rules #5.

9 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7016 23:50

Haha, it also seems that I saved the bum of http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1352994996/14 by sneaking my post right in front of his. I believe that he forgot about E-Prime (and I hope that mine is okay).

I ask >>15 to pretend that >>14 is complimenting >>13 instead of >>12.

10 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7017 10:19

Y U NO UPDATE RULE 4?!

  1. It's mutable.
  2. >>18 changed it (and wasn't caught not complementing the previous poster).
  3. >>20 didn't reflect this.
  4. >>23 changed it but broke a rule.
  5. >>24 rolled it back to >>18's state.
  6. >>25 didn't reflect it.

It's mutable and it was changed, come on!

11 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7017 18:46

Sorry, Mr. 27, I liked your idea, but after getting hit for my earlier post, 14, I just had to spring a rule violation on somebody. It's fun! Hooray for bureaucracy!

12 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7017 19:50

>>11
To be clear, 27's changes are ignored for now?

13 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7017 21:17

>>12

Now that I look at the rules, there's nothing specifically saying that rule changes in rule-breaking posts are to be ignored ever since rule 4 got changed in post 10. We've just been operating so far assuming so.

Somebody should probably clear that up.

14 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7017 22:38

>>13
See >>10.
http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1352994996/18,20,23,24,25

15 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7018 01:56

I purposely "forgot" about E-Prime in >>23 in the hopes nobody would notice and I could get an extra DQNcoin, but when I refreshed the page to make sure nobody else posted I forgot to put my name back in! All my plans, foiled!

16 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7018 06:30

Today I learn Hostess is going out of business and it occurred to me I've never actually had a Twinkie.

17 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-7018 06:32

>>16
　　　ヾヽヽ
　 　(*‘ω‘ *)　Look at this idiot posting in the wrong thread!
　　　 ミ＿ノ
　　　　″″

18 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8017 11:05

I'm confused about http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1352994996/42-44.

>>44 claims that >>43 did not follow the rule in >>42, but >>43 changed >>42's rule. Are you supposed to follow the rules as they are before or after you change them? Or is >>44 disregarding >>43 because he didn't break any rules?

19 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8017 14:25

I think I ended the Nomic thread, but I messed up my own post number. Oh well.

20 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8017 15:06

Oh shit, I forgot deletion. This is fun, you know?

21 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8017 18:09

Does deleting count as modifying?

22 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8017 23:57

How do we restart the Nomic thread?
Some DQN crashed it.

23 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8018 01:44

I buried the corpse. I will be interested to see if/how a veteran manages to restart it.

24 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8018 15:46

It was gracefully restarted.

25 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8018 22:18

I don't know how much of a pedantic butthead I would be for disregarding >>57's post because of the broken <b> tags.

26 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8018 23:08

Nice one, restarter.

27 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8019 01:59

CONTROVERSIAL MOVE INCOMING
I HOPE SOMEONE DOES SOMETHING CREATIVE INSTEAD OF DELETING THE RULE

ALSO
http://convertcase.net/
MY SHIFT BROKE. THANKS RULE 15!

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: