NEET mountain village (21)

1 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-18 13:27 ID:+qRwTd15

There is a NEET/Hiki mountain village in Japan i wish there was something like this in the west.

2 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-18 14:16 ID:lL2mi0Gp

That's amazing.
Ideally, the houses they live in would be easier to maintain though, so they can do it themselves and don't have to live with random holes in the floor.

If I ever win the lottery, I'm gonna do one of these (from most expensive to least):
a) Buy a lot of land in a remote area, build NEET village somewhere and rent out the rest, which then pays for the upkeep of NEET village. Takes a lot of desirable land to do this, so it's very expensive, but would mean the least amount of work for the residents.
b) Buy a moderate amount of land in a remote area, build NEET village and start a forest garden, which is a planned rainforest designed to produce food with minimal to no maintenance. You just pick food up as it's in season and replace a few plants every 5 years or so.
Downside being, still quite expensive since setting up a forest garden is expensive and still needs a fair amount of land. Also, the diet you get is eccentric, for example, chestnuts as your main carb source.
c) Buy a small amount of land in a remote area, build NEET village and surround with deep beds for self-sufficient farming. Takes a handful of hours of work per week, but not that much. It's cheapest. Probably the most realistic.

Houses would be made of cob, so they're durable, easily customizable, and can be built and maintained by the residents as needed.
Only people content in NEETdom would be allowed in, failed normalfags moping about failing would be banned.

3 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-19 19:57 ID:QXcvi7tm

There are Americans living in remote America who don't care to live beyond a subsistence lifestyle. You can do this as well, you can get enough money to invest into a house in the middle of the wilderness then disconnect from the rest of society. You can even build your own house from the resources available in the wilderness. It's perfectly feasible to live a subsistence lifestyle where you work for your own survival, where you can do without the need to trade your labor for a big pile of cash.

4 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-25 06:45 ID:+qRwTd15


Western NEETs are so neurotic. I don't see a commune lasting very long before everything spergs apart.

5 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-25 13:01 ID:kK2KckLA

I'm pretty sure he's talking about being that creepy hobo who lives in a teepee in the woods "off the grid" rather than any sort of communal situation.

6 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-27 05:15 ID:QXcvi7tm

I don't think it makes any kind of sense for an anti-social commune to work and thrive together. Living in society inherently means working in harmony and and working with willing cooperation to the society. Those kinds of neurotic anti-social individuals who don't care to live in society can either fend for themselves in the wilderness (what >>5 was alluding to) or they can die by themselves.

7 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-27 14:37 ID:hG2ZdXi3

lol that you think society has anything to do with "harmony" and "willing cooperation". domination and crude self-interest have been the basis of human civilization since the dawn of history. most antisocial people just need a hunger in the belly or a gun to the head and they'll work together like bees in a hive.

8 Name: !!MU/MFysn : 2021-02-27 21:02 ID:p+vHSrgq

You sacks of shit would actually have to do some hard work for once in your lives. Good luck.

9 Name: Anonymous : 2021-02-28 02:05 ID:+qRwTd15


You're implying all NEETs and hikis are just lazy people which is not the case a lot of us are the way we are because of mental health issues.

11 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-05 04:18 ID:egJebvyw


That sign isn't wrong you don't belong here.

12 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-05 05:54 ID:WK228zsZ

You're implying all NEETs and hikis are just lazy people which is not the case, work just fucking sucks.

13 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-05 06:18 ID:QXcvi7tm

It's impossible to steer a hierarchy of people without people submitting to authority. In a violent society, the strong people would torture and kill the weak people, while the weak will work as slaves. This is forced cooperation rather than voluntary cooperation. It's non-sense to generalise human societies in this way. Human societies who live under the basis of this violent fear are inherently unstable as long-term system of social growth and are inherently self-destructive over the long-term.

A small society of individuals who are living in the wilderness and are not cooperating can not be a society that lives a long life.

14 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-05 16:36 ID:Heaven

should read 30 not 16 in that case

15 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 02:14 ID:TGmxx9Kz

Agree. Only lonely edge lords with too much time think that all authority is violent.

16 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 05:14 ID:Heaven

Nowadays you can kill a person with a push of a button, just fire him. Does it still count as a violence? It's still aggression, I guess.

17 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 06:22 ID:WK228zsZ

Read Foucault.

18 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 06:43 ID:TGmxx9Kz

All power is via violence? Guess Beatles & Marilyn Monroe have big guns.

19 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 11:52 ID:6ZjrI3X2

All power is via whoever barks the loudest

20 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 17:51 ID:WK228zsZ

If that's your sole concept of violence you really ought to read more lol

21 Name: Anonymous : 2021-04-06 22:45 ID:/3EASbIv

Celebrities themselves are powerless. They're merely corporate property. What monetary policy did Marilyn Monroe lobby? Which elections have the Beatles influenced? Popular personas are just actors with no agency of their own. Their owners wield true power.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...