The Theory of Love (264)

178 Name: Ulrich : 2006-05-17 01:30 ID:3Z2UDvZ3

>>173

>Sex isn't need in a relationship.

Bingo. Entirely true.

>But one thing you forgot is that love is also composed of more than just commitment. You have to care deeply and understand them. Love is made up of the affection and caring and commitment between 2 people. And no matter what you say Ulrich, love is real.

I stated that a ton of posts ago. Love is comprised of three components: passion, commitment and infatuation. I never said that love was not real, it's just a fragment, a vague persona in the minds of many.

>>174

>Most would disagree that your claim that "sex isn't a need in a relationship."

That's typical, since that is usually the core part of a human being's thoughts. Sex is not a necessity, it is so to speak a luxury, mainly because you do not need it(unless for reproduction)and people use it as a tool to file their own pleasure thoroughly.

>>175

I invited her because she is a good friend, and compared to myself, one of the only intellectuals in our school. She understands me and my logic. I invited her because I appreciate her being such a great person, a great friend that bonds my heart and soul together. I need not a girlfriend, I only need friends. They alone fill me with contempt and are the only shining light for me in this devastated world of corruption and despair. It seems you are becoming a bit too possesive...do not let it overtake your mind, for it will in the end cause despair for you. And of course you can come as well, if you wish. You should have just asked with becoming so enraged, since it seems you are a bit irritated.

>>176

I suggest you re-read the beginning to the end of the posts then.

>>177

#1 philosophical rule: assume nothing. If you actually read you can see the solidified logic, for they are actual facts. People do act in such a way, and the world is corrupt. That is a fact.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.