Chicken Tartare Edition
Previously:
#1 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1213916710/
#2 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1250275007/
#3 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1292544745/
#4 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1315193920/
#5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1326391378/
#6 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1333279425/
#7 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1340196069/
#8 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1346800288/
#9 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1353182673/
#10 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1360549149/
#11 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260033/
#11.5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260120/
#12 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1372849946/-255,257-
#13 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1368127055/
#14 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1395672319/
#15 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1409746601/
#16 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1420075161/
#17 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1430947686/
#18 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1440133389/
#19 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1447380051/
#20 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1454364216/
#21 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1462941578/
#22 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1473295155/-383,385-
#23 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1480168637/
#24 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489348442/
#25 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1503631448/
#26 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1519019746/
I want to update a dead link on tanasinn.info but the captchas are broken!
and it good
Nobody seriously uses a desktop any more, unless you have a job, and want more than one screen,
³
>>367
Maybe if you're at an old place going by company culture from the 80s. Coworking spaces and modern startups are often BYOD and people use laptops. Besides, you can use multiple screens on a laptop too. Airplay, Thunderbolt, HDMI, mini-DP, and so on.
You can always remotely delegate workloads to a remote server or desktop in a closet somewhere, but that's not the same as always being at a desktop.
>>369
That's all probably true for "modern startup" silicon valley shitculture where the employees are paid in foosball and the directors are all cheapskates.
No business that gives a shit about data protection and, well, general liability would trust BYOD, and no employee should either, for multiple obvious reasons.
I was the second hire in my company two years ago, so they're not old. They have their own premises, and I get a nice workstation with a real keyboard and 3 bezel-less monitors (more if I want them; the graphics card has some spare slots), and I get to stop caring about my work when I'm not actually working (not as easy when you get given a laptop you can take home). That's not "company culture from the 80s" at all, that's just making my work life tolerable.
>>367 I am not a fan of short-sighted sweeping statements... I love my iMac and my MBP, but the laptop stays in a bag under my bed unless I really need it in the field. Both have served me well for years and I give them both a little kiss at night before I go to bed.
frosted butts
yatte dekinai koto ga arumai
i cannot get windows to use the 2nd ethernet jack on my new PC as a quick and dirty uplink for my old PC unless i want to (1) use wifi as the uplink or (2) manually set IPs on both computers and be satisfied with no internet on the old one.
like, ICS/bridging absolutely are not doing what they should do, before we even get into how they could be a lot clearer about what they say they do.
yes, this is not the best network topology and I could get a cheap hub or something instead of having wasted the past two hours, but that's not the point; there is absolutely no reason this shouldn't Just Work™ if Gran-Gran is a part of your target market.
I play some Artificial Academy 2 every night, I guess that's sort of like having sex with my computer.
>>369 BYOD startups with open floorplans also inevitably fail after a year or two because it turns out open floorplans fucking suck and are just a way for your (((venture capitalist))) boss to use flowery buzzwords to disguise the fact that he's too much of a stingy cunt to shell out for cubicles and actual company computers.
I don't think Arabs (especially Saudis) are pleased that many people will start reading their web-sites in Arabic with google translate... it's something like a revolution
>>378
Is this a joke? Google Translate has been around for a long time, buddy. Are you new to the internet?
yeah, I am behind the times.. Just tried GT on arabic BBC..
fuck it is almost perfect...
damn I never wanted to live in Blade Runner world...
So Brin and Zukerberg will rule the world...
fuck I am out
>So you're a neckbeard who uses desktops and you're antisemitic too. Reevaluate your life choices.
projection, ad hominem
not an argument bud, try again
https://theendofzion.com/ is blocked on my ISP. what about yours?
while ordinary russians dont have a warm feelings for jews, I believe that Russian goverment plays the most important part in the internation sionism
after all Stalin created Isreal
basically because of one gay man (Alan Mathison Turing) our civilisation died
I wonder what we will all do in future
russians are insane
>>388
humans evolved to create a self-reproducing robotic civilization to spread through the stars.
I think we will be eating artifical meat burgers and having sex with sexy androids... that is all to humans for now
fuck space nobody need it. even with the current technologies it is MURI
Clearly, we're not done evolving
go move to your mars bunker, faggot
I am OUT
Enjoy your "life" on your disgusting mars deserts
maybe you will turn into smelly arab
good job faggot
space travel is impossible anyway
the only way is quantium leap
but fuck it too
I won't enjoy disgusting mars desert
compared to mars desert Russia is heaven
We all know that you are dorks
What the fuck is going on?
better start raising some funds now! before it is too late
exploring space is like playing original 1996 DOS Daggerfall
400GET
son, there is great future for you!
You will be a fine Zuckerberg's servant
i think you have that backwards
I use a desktop, but I don't think I'd qualify as a neckbeard.
Cuteness comes from within.
>>383
The ((())) thing is a racist dog whistle used to imply that someone or something is jewish (but it's used in a negative way). Don't pretend that it's something else. And the other post mentioned desktop computers.
That's not projection, that's reading comprehension.
How very (((redpilled))) of you.
basically we are saudi people
and now it is the saudization
would you donate your kidney to Roman Abramovich? I think you do
When you're on an online conversation, and you call someone a stupid fucking retard, it's hilarious when they respond by pointing out your "ad-hominem". You're, like, not even denying that you're a fucking retard, just pointing out that it's just a bit of a tangent there. Practically a tacit admission.
I blame liberalism and Paul Graham that our youth is so obsessed with pointing out fallacies online.
>>410
I disagree. I actually see more people committing logical fallacies and not as many people pointing them out. The average person would say something like "fuck you" or "google it" or "I'm not even going to explain it to you" or something like that. They're not even going to bother with pointing out ad hominem or other fallacies. You seem to forget that most people are dumb and mobile devices and apps are easier to use than ever before. The level of discourse online is getting worse every year.
It sucks when you know something but someone feels the need to explain it to you anyway. Sometimes it's kinda awkward to say "look, I already know what you're explaining, please stop" so you just say "yeah" and "ok" while they painstakingly explain something you already know, and they're talking down to you the whole time as if YOU'RE the dumb one.
>>406 Huh, I've never heard of that brackets thing before, I read it like he was being sarcastic, the stereotypical venture capitalist boss who doesn't really understand the work he pays his employees do.
>>410 Calling someone a "stupid fucking retard" is more of an indication of your own low intelligence, but yes, it's hilarious when someone assumes you're worth talking to only to be proven wrong. Have you ever had a girlfriend, by the way? Did you ever argue with her?
>>413
Personally I never even heard of it until a lot of Twitter bluechecks started using it ironically on their own names. And now I quite often see normies use it without understanding what it signifies, ironically or not.
I am also not a fan of even the concept of a "dog whistle", fwiw.
>>414
Yes, but what does that have to do with anything? Are you getting posts mixed up?
>>415
Wow, you're not a fan of something! Reality will bend to your every whim and preference.
Guess what? Things still exist even if you don't like them. Dog whistles are a real thing. It's the whole "aha, you can't accuse me of racism as long as I don't say overtly racist things! I'll just make up new racist slang and indicators to show my hatred! then you can't call it racist!"
What a bunch of bullshit. ((())) is antisemitic and you know it.
I think posting on this website is making me dumber. Interacting with neckbeards is bad.
Nah it's just the condescending fuckwits who just want somewhere to feel better about themselves
>>416 It's easy to turn to childish namecalling when arguing with strangers online, I just wondered if that's how you'd treat your sweetie-pie when she gives you the red nonsense.
Four hundred twenty blaze it
I just misread condescending as crossdressing.
>>416 Are you so fucking retarded that you don't even see the much more dangerous other side of your statement, which is "you can be racist without actually saying or doing anything racist, because the tone police have decided your words had a racist intent."
>>417 You were already dumb, if anything leaving the ideological circlejerk of your upper middle class Silicon Valley BYOD open office once in a while and learning how to view dissenting opinions without immediately deciding the other side is guilty of wrongthink and shutting your eyes while chanting thought-terminating cliches might do you some good.
I wasn't going to engage this dumbassery but I can't resist any longer. I'm sick of abiding reactionary neoliberal dipshits masquerading as leftists.
If you're an actual leftist and not just a limousine liberal paying lip service to the "inclusionary" ideological zeitgeist so you don't lose your comfy BYOD open office Silicon Valley tech job then ignoring the Jews is dangerous self-deception. The Jews are one of the greatest enemies of international class solidarity out there. No other group spends more time and money lobbying for unrestricted immigration, open borders, busting unions, importing low-skill workers willing to work for next to nothing, all in the name of enriching themselves while further dividing the proletariat along racial lines, suppressing class consciousness. Certainly 100% of Jews aren't such rootless cosmopolitans, but a disproportionate amount of international capitalists are Jews; pretending otherwise is ignoring an uncomfortable truth in the hope it'll eventually just go away.
At some point the "left", once the champions of the working class, figured out they could continue paying lip service to the working class and using their votes to stay in power while in actuality having policy that differs little from the other puppets of international capital who enrich themselves at the expense of the proletariat. Insincere neoliberal ideologues spout charming but meaningless platitudes about how maximum diversity is on the horizon (if this sounds familiar it should) and then wonder why their support is eroding among the working class they used to champion. The brand of condescending proselytizing becoming increasingly popular among the "left" is also annoying at best and dangerous at worst. At best, you make an obscure yellow fever anime messageboard that's already been dying a slow death since 2009 slightly shittier. At worst, you actively convert the working class away from their own best interest and toward right-wing populism when they rightfully bristle at your inept lecturing and mother-knows-best attitude and purposely go looking for "whatever the opposite of what that guy says."
http://anti-politics.org/feral-faun/ideology-of-victimization.html
Better writeup on the subject than I'm capable of, and considering it was written in 1992, long before the rise of internet echo chambers, somewhat prohpetic.
>>426 sorry, I'm done now.
I mean I'm not done being a dumbass, I'm just done posting about it.
>>419
Are you seriously getting mad that I'm calling someone out for being antisemitic? You're just trying to change the subject. ((())) is an antisemitic dog whistle. Quit trying to change the subject.
>>422
((())) serves no purpose other than to mean "I think this person is Jewish" and it's used in a negative context. It's ridiculous that there are people who justify this. Sometimes, people use it in their Twitter name to show that they're an enemy of alt-right racists, but that's the only time when it's not racist. But in this thread, it has been used in a racist manner.
You have no self-awareness.
>>423
Yeah, I'M the one in an echo chamber. Not the people who are trying to normalize antisemitism. Okay.
>>424
I wouldn't even describe myself as a leftist. Do you think anyone who disagrees with you is a leftist? You know who's the biggest supporter of Israel? It's certainly not the democrats. Leftists tend to be in favor of Palestine/Gaza rather than Israel. Leftists are often antisemitic, which is funny considering that they pretend to be the party of tolerance and progress.
I really shouldn't even be responding to someone who is unironically racist, but here's what I have to say about these conspiracy theories about Jews:
The flaw with a lot of alt-right conspiracies is that they assume all power is completely consolidated in the world. It's true that there are a lot of rich and powerful people. But there are actually quite a lot of billionaires now, and new ones are popping up a lot now, especially in America and some developing countries (lots of income inequality now). But the fundamental flaw in alt-right thinking is that you think all rich and powerful people are having clandestine meetings and getting along and making plans together. In reality, there are many different ideologies among the elite and they don't always get along. Not all rich people get along.
You want a simple and easy explanation for complicated issues. It's intellectually lazy to tell yourself that Jews are behind everything. In reality, Jewish people are just like everyone else. I have Jewish friends and I've even dated a Jewish girl before. The real problems in society are with extremely rich and powerful people. There are rich and powerful people from all different backgrounds, and guess what? They don't all get along, don't all have the same religion, and aren't all from the same place in the world.
You get confused with confirmation bias because some shitty /pol/ images pick and choose a few Jewish people but ignore all of the non-Jewish people who are also global elites who serve their own best interests.
Billionaires are powerful and control the media. But not all billionaires are Jewish, and not all billionaires get along. There is no global conspiracy. Occam's Razor and all that. Peter Thiel isn't Jewish. Dr. Dre isn't Jewish. Bill Gates isn't Jewish. Xi Jinping isn't Jewish. Putin isn't Jewish. I could go on and on. There are plenty of people who are absurdly rich and/or powerful who have nothing to do with Judaism.
At the end of the day, people want to be happy. Money can help with that. People want to be powerful. Money can get you power. Powerful people can buy politicians or media outlets. But there is no single person or single group that controls everything. Instead, there are a lot of powerful rich people who control different portions of the media or politics.
But I bet you're not open to listening to ideas that don't back up your preconceived notions. You're either going to ignore me or just double down on your incorrect views.
And to further clarify: I am not Jewish, I am not antisemitic, I am not a social justice warrior, I am not a leftist, and I am not alt-right. I'm not a centrist or a neocon either. It's almost as if there are more stances than that, and not all opinions can be summed up in some twitter bio-sized label!
I wonder what tokiko thinks about it.
Ohh, like straight-edge kids putting x's around their name?
>>414
I admit that fucking retard is a bit of a hyperbole meant to rile up, but even I know that you wouldn't point out your girlfriend's ad hominems in any discussion, because that's fucking retarded.
> You know who's the biggest supporter of Israel? It's certainly not the democrats. Leftists tend to be in favor of Palestine/Gaza rather than Israel. Leftists are often antisemitic
Ok, who invited the jewish ethnostate defense force, raise your hands.
Is only thread. Why you heff to be mad?
By the power of vodka, squats, and chiki briki, I RUSH B
>>435
it's easy to think people are Mad Online™ when they really aren't
https://i.warosu.org/data/cgl/img/0085/75/1441162149414.png
What I meant to ask is how covering a cover song even works. Who receives payment for such a thing. Also how frequent is that? I mean I know there's jazz standards and stuff, but like in pop and rock music, is there such an effort to further transform songs into unrecognition?
>>437
I used to know someone in a cover band. I don't think they ever gave royalties to the real band. But then again, they were only a local gig and didn't get really famous or anything.
I think Chuck Klosterman had an interesting perspective on cover bands in "Sex, Drugs, and Cocoa Puffs" where he said that people do that to piggyback off the fame of the real band and they don't care that they're nobodies who will never make a name for themselves.
Not all cover bands attempt to change the source material. Sometimes, they just try their best to recreate it. I've never heard of a cover song of a cover song, but maybe people who cover Weird Al songs count for that?
>>428 How much are they paying you? It's like you're a bot and just dumping pre-fabricated talking points after running over certain keywords.
http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1135263177/143 this post is a bannable offence!
>>439
Yeah, I'm being paid to post on a site that has like 5-10 users.
Seriously, get a grip on reality if you resort to such insane mental gymnastics.
Imagine being so far gone that you think anyone who disagrees with you is a bot. Sad.
I wouldn't have typed an unreadable wall of text for free, honestly.
(☞ίΝί)☞ maybe you're illiterate
He is a man of few words
I write haiku, son
Not so sure of my future
Five seven five, bruh
Anyway it is of zero importance now, because the new A.I. civilization is about to begin! it's all history now. I am not sure I will like it.
briefs mark the soul of wit
-- willson shatingdale
Hopefully the AIs recognize my incredible abilities in areas that I haven't even dreamed of and they put me in charge of a space fleet with a fully customizable sexbot harem
I am dissolving.
>>425
That was only a year ago!
And I'm not trying to restart anything, but haven't you heard of Usenet? It was basically entirely echo chambers.
>>454
Were you even around for Usenet? It's either before your time, or you're a dinosaur.
>>455
Odd question. It's still going strong, in the forms of Google Groups and NZB.
Plus, The Eternal September started on Usenet, and it's still September, 1993.
>>441,442
Imagine being such a dumbass fucking American teenbro that you:
a)dump a completely irrelevant barely coherent script of prefab talking points bullet-for-bullet after seeing the word "jews" and "leftist" in the same post with zero regard for context;
b)are completely incapable of considering things outside the lens of American politics and think useless labels like "Democrat" have any meaning outside America.
But I'm so sure your alt right /pol/ boogeyman is super concerned about workers' liberation and international class consciousness, you dumb illiterate motherfucker. Words have actual meanings, they don't just mean "people I don't like."
Although in this case "alt-right" literally has no meaning because it was coined to begin with to mean "people I don't like who also watch anime" or some shit.
>>457
You are still attempting to justify the fact that someone (you?) used blatantly antisemitic dog whistling. ((())) is antisemitic, there's no getting around it. You seem upset when people call you out on your shit.
The whole parenthesis bullshit was ironically amplified by idiot reporters, the same idiot reporters who take selfies with richard spencer because they "believe in balance and courtesy" and ignore palestines being murdered by the dozen because who cares. It was a signifier limited to a small clique of pseudo-vanguard internet cryptofascists which have fallen from grace ever since trump distanced himself from "sloppy steve"[sic] and were eventually brought back to their rightful place as internet losers drawing pictures of fat frogs on paint.
No one cares, kike lover
