[Wikipedia] ITT DQN QUALITY Wikipedia Links [Part IV] (999)

1 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 14:18

Previously: The Original[1], Part II[2], and Part III[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOR/DME

This Wikipedia thread is a stub. You can help The Elitist Superstructure by expanding it.

2 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 14:19

3 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 16:09

4 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 19:13

5 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 20:38

7 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 00:26

8 Name: also I hate you : 1993-09-10068 01:23

>>6
Since Fucking just changed their name this year (in the 10000s) that was a different city's article when that was posted

9 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 01:39

>>6,7
I think it's cool that someone recalls the links posted here and encouragement to avoid duplicates provides a nice incentive to reread the old threads. However >>6 should adopt a mascot like Mr. Likes To Age Threads or something for these sort of callout posts. I think it would be a lot less frustrating for the unfortunate victims to be part of some sort of dqn dqn lol hijinks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Dog,_Dublin

10 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 03:54

11 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 09:30

>>8
It was the bit about it very recently changing its name that reminded me I'd read about it. Also I don't care lol lick my bum x
>>9

>encouragement to avoid duplicates provides a nice incentive to reread the old threads.

I don't care about that either lol. When I link to a previous post I'm usually just like "huh, interesting". If someone finds that frustrating or feels like an "unfortunate victim", that's ridiculous! Haha! It's never a "callout post" like "Ahh, gotcha! You should have checked if this was posted!" But I admit since the first time someone said it felt like that, I have taken a bit of pleasure hitting Submit knowing it's going to wind them up 😜 Maybe I will post with a name from now on though, I'll think about it...

12 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10069 08:01

13 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10069 08:35

14 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10069 08:50

>>13
One day in our lifetimes the NYT will no longer be considered a valid source and its because of stuff like this

15 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 00:53

17 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 02:47

>>12
I read that as Renai Circulation and got confused when I saw the kidney picture.

18 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 04:36

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index
A rare "copyright violation" template!

19 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 08:17

>>18
See also:
Censorship by country
Internet censorship by country

20 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 11:09

>>13

>See also:
>- owning the libs
>- shitposting

I'm on the weird part of Wikipedia.

21 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 11:28

22 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10072 02:04

23 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10072 08:15

24 Name: Mr. Wikipedia Dick : 1993-09-10072 09:16

Hello, I'm Mr. Wikipedia Dick. I have read Wikipedia and The Elitist Superstructure of DQN from beginning to end, and Wikipedia is my dick.

>>23 just posted a link to a wikipedia article similar to one https://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1431720556/106 posted. Don't get your knickers twisted - this is for information purposes only. Now let's continue sharing –‚c‚p‚m ‚p‚t‚`‚k‚h‚s‚x– Wikipedia links.

25 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10072 10:05

28 Name: ­ : 1993-09-10073 11:46

29 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10073 14:33

30 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10074 02:13

31 Name: (iœjĪªª²iœj) : 1993-09-10074 03:06

32 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10079 07:47

33 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10079 17:59

34 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 08:14

35 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 13:42

36 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 18:56

37 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 19:09

39 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10082 10:35

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.