>>6
Since Fucking just changed their name this year (in the 10000s) that was a different city's article when that was posted
>>8
It was the bit about it very recently changing its name that reminded me I'd read about it. Also I don't care lol lick my bum x
>>9
>encouragement to avoid duplicates provides a nice incentive to reread the old threads.
I don't care about that either lol. When I link to a previous post I'm usually just like "huh, interesting". If someone finds that frustrating or feels like an "unfortunate victim", that's ridiculous! Haha! It's never a "callout post" like "Ahh, gotcha! You should have checked if this was posted!" But I admit since the first time someone said it felt like that, I have taken a bit of pleasure hitting Submit knowing it's going to wind them up 😜 Maybe I will post with a name from now on though, I'll think about it...
>>13
One day in our lifetimes the NYT will no longer be considered a valid source and its because of stuff like this
>>12
I read that as Renai Circulation and got confused when I saw the kidney picture.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index
A rare "copyright violation" template!
>>18
See also:
Censorship by country
Internet censorship by country
Hello, I'm Mr. Wikipedia Dick. I have read Wikipedia and The Elitist Superstructure of DQN from beginning to end, and Wikipedia is my dick.
>>23 just posted a link to a wikipedia article similar to one https://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1431720556/106 posted. Don't get your knickers twisted - this is for information purposes only. Now let's continue sharing –‚c‚p‚m ‚p‚t‚`‚k‚h‚s‚x– Wikipedia links.