[Wikipedia] ITT DQN QUALITY Wikipedia Links [Part IV] (999)

1 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 14:18

Previously: The Original[1], Part II[2], and Part III[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOR/DME

This Wikipedia thread is a stub. You can help The Elitist Superstructure by expanding it.

2 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 14:19

3 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 16:09

4 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 19:13

5 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10067 20:38

7 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 00:26

8 Name: also I hate you : 1993-09-10068 01:23

>>6
Since Fucking just changed their name this year (in the 10000s) that was a different city's article when that was posted

9 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 01:39

>>6,7
I think it's cool that someone recalls the links posted here and encouragement to avoid duplicates provides a nice incentive to reread the old threads. However >>6 should adopt a mascot like Mr. Likes To Age Threads or something for these sort of callout posts. I think it would be a lot less frustrating for the unfortunate victims to be part of some sort of dqn dqn lol hijinks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Dog,_Dublin

10 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 03:54

11 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10068 09:30

>>8
It was the bit about it very recently changing its name that reminded me I'd read about it. Also I don't care lol lick my bum x
>>9

>encouragement to avoid duplicates provides a nice incentive to reread the old threads.

I don't care about that either lol. When I link to a previous post I'm usually just like "huh, interesting". If someone finds that frustrating or feels like an "unfortunate victim", that's ridiculous! Haha! It's never a "callout post" like "Ahh, gotcha! You should have checked if this was posted!" But I admit since the first time someone said it felt like that, I have taken a bit of pleasure hitting Submit knowing it's going to wind them up 😜 Maybe I will post with a name from now on though, I'll think about it...

12 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10069 08:01

13 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10069 08:35

14 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10069 08:50

>>13
One day in our lifetimes the NYT will no longer be considered a valid source and its because of stuff like this

15 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 00:53

17 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 02:47

>>12
I read that as Renai Circulation and got confused when I saw the kidney picture.

18 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 04:36

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index
A rare "copyright violation" template!

19 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 08:17

>>18
See also:
Censorship by country
Internet censorship by country

20 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 11:09

>>13

>See also:
>- owning the libs
>- shitposting

I'm on the weird part of Wikipedia.

21 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10071 11:28

22 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10072 02:04

23 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10072 08:15

24 Name: Mr. Wikipedia Dick : 1993-09-10072 09:16

Hello, I'm Mr. Wikipedia Dick. I have read Wikipedia and The Elitist Superstructure of DQN from beginning to end, and Wikipedia is my dick.

>>23 just posted a link to a wikipedia article similar to one https://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1431720556/106 posted. Don't get your knickers twisted - this is for information purposes only. Now let's continue sharing –‚c‚p‚m ‚p‚t‚`‚k‚h‚s‚x– Wikipedia links.

25 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10072 10:05

28 Name: ­ : 1993-09-10073 11:46

29 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10073 14:33

30 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10074 02:13

31 Name: (iœjĪªª²iœj) : 1993-09-10074 03:06

32 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10079 07:47

33 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10079 17:59

34 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 08:14

35 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 13:42

36 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 18:56

37 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10081 19:09

39 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10082 10:35

42 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10087 02:57

43 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10087 19:23

>>33
https://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1279243535/299

see also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Dekker#Death

and unrelated
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vending_machine#History

Wikipedia dick was never just one guy, the dick is inside all of us. quit crying and find an original contribution if you don't like it.

44 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10087 20:13

45 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10087 21:41

46 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10088 05:02

>>45
this smaller version of wikipedia dick isn't inside of me

47 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10088 05:20

48 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10088 07:58

49 Name: ( ´_ゝ`) : 1993-09-10088 08:54

>>33,43,47 I always thought Michael Hutchence was the most infamous victim of autoerotic asphyxiation, but that seems to have been made up by his former lover?

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.